Subject:
|
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:05:43 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
C576653@CCLABS.nomorespamMISSOURI.EDU
|
Viewed:
|
1156 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > If you are saying that they shouldn't be eligble for unemployment, then why do
> > they pay unemployment insurance.
>
> Excellent question. Why does anyone pay it? Try not paying it, if you
> can. I've paid it for 20 years and never collected a penny in
> unemployment. We're mixing current system thinking with future system
> thinking. To be clear... yes, under today's system, the law says you can
> collect unemployment, and we have told everyone that they're entitled to
> it. Not everyone thinks about morals very clearly so we can't well
> expect them to connect the dots and take the moral stand of not
> collecting it.
It sounds as if you're saying that the morally 'best' course of action
would be to stand off and not take the unemployment. I disagree
strongly. I think that if you disagree with the system in the way that
you (and I) seem to, you owe it to America (The USA anyway) to belly up
to the trough and milk it for everything you can. Only by breaking the
treasury's back can we bring reform.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
