Subject:
|
Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:45:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
232 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Sorry, I did not realise you were policing this "debate". Perhaps you should
> > give an outline of the type of response you do want?
> >
> > I have no problem with anyone posting links to just about any view they
> > wish. I still view the link as fun way of communicating an argument, and I
> > invite readers to view it again:
> > http://www.bradycampaign.org/activism/heston/movie.asp
>
> So posting links is OK but posting text (from something that's unlinkable)
> isn't, in your view? Or is it that you can post stuff in response but not
> initiate via posting, in your view?
Larry,
What you do is cut-and-paste LP dogma repeatedly in an effort to incite a
noisy debate. When you do it, you are unwilling to justify what you post. My
most recent action aside, if people are unhappy with me justifying any point
I make with an accessible reference (I expect this will appear a novel idea
to you) they are free to complain - just like they did when you last spammed
this group.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
