Debate : 11899


Off-Topic / Debate / 11899	11898 \| 11900

Subject:	Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:24:25 GMT
Viewed:	239 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > Sorry, I did not realise you were policing this "debate". Perhaps you should > give an outline of the type of response you do want? > > I have no problem with anyone posting links to just about any view they > wish. I still view the link as fun way of communicating an argument, and I > invite readers to view it again: > http://www.bradycampaign.org/activism/heston/movie.asp So posting links is OK but posting text (from something that's unlinkable) isn't, in your view? Or is it that you can post stuff in response but not initiate via posting, in your view?

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
(...) Larry, What you do is cut-and-paste LP dogma repeatedly in an effort to incite a noisy debate. When you do it, you are unwilling to justify what you post. My most recent action aside, if people are unhappy with me justifying any point I make (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
(...) Sorry, I did not realise you were policing this "debate". Perhaps you should give an outline of the type of response you do want? I have no problem with anyone posting links to just about any view they wish. I still view the link as fun way of (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search