To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *716 (-20)
  Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
(...) Let the police deal with the criminals. My bank and the government can keep their noses out of my damned business. (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <371274B4.E66CE6CE@v...er.net>... (...) God help us if we put some controls in place to deter criminal activity... Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
(...) Hrmmm, not being into the political scene much anymore, I gave www.congress.gov a shot. It brought me to (URL) I've never seen before but seems pretty darn cool. Anyway, from there I decided to look at Legislation in the 106th Congress, and (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
(...) I am surprised, but pleasantly so. I had assumed that an e-mail petition would not be taken seriously due to several technical issues. Wow. :-, (...) Do you have a URL pointing to more info on Ron Paul's bill? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
(...) See my sig. 170K of the comments (out of 250K or so, 99+% against) were originated at the site I reference. But the battle is not over, there are plans afoot to do it anyway, rebadged and repackaged. Support Ron Paul's (R-TX) bill preventing (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Federal Reserve Board - "Know Your Customer" Rule
 
There was a discussion, either here or in RTL, about the proposed "Know Your Customer Rule" that was designed to alleviate Money Laundering. The proposal has been withdrawn due to "...an unprecedented number of comments on the proposal from the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Motorized 5571
 
Looks like he is using a second RCX. Bob Fay rfay@we.mediaone.net The Shop (URL) Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:36FFF57A.2F2D43...ger.net... (...) detailed (...) by (...) a (...) car... (...) <F97y7L.Dvz@lugnet.com> (...) ... (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Motorized 5571
 
(...) Er, ah, never mind. I see it was done with 2 RCXs and IR communication. How well does that work non-line of sight? What would be really cool would be to build a steering wheel coupled to a rotation sensor (geared way down so one wheel turn is (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Motorized 5571
 
How did you RC it? I have motorized a number of Technic models, including using a Micro motor to allow steering, but have always used a battery box and long connector wires to control it. (...) Larry Pieniazek (URL) Know your Customer is wounded, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
 
  Motorized 5571
 
Was: RE: Who had the 5571 Inventory? I just got my 5571 last week and it was not only a very cool and detailed model, but a lot of fun to modify! I made it into a very cool RC Truck by adding a steering motor and a motor to the rear wheel carriage. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
 
  Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
 
<36FBA351.DA66625A@c...ulane.edu> <F97y7L.Dvz@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit d'Oh!!!!!! (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
 
(...) IMO we (...) exceptions, of (...) dollar (...) Err - I don't think that's quite relevant to the question of free markets. Yes it's frustrating that TLG won't offer bulk and won't rerelease old sets etc. But that doesn't stop it from being a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
 
Unless of course Lego rereleases it due to popular demand from lugnet ... :) You realise of course that your mentioning the set made me go and look it up on lugnet. Which made me think 'wow - that is a cool set - I want it'. Which will of course (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
 
d'Oh! So, what you saying is that I will never be able to get my 7740 (pout)? I better start saving now. Chris (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Ninja Figs - Reverse Auction
 
Why do I have to be RFC compliant? Some harvester may very well visit here and I'd rather not make it easy for it. If people want to reach me, it's easy enough. (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) I am guilty of the above. I finished it. But your right, the series did go progressively downhill. I do believe I saw a new book in the series. A couple of months ago, I saw a new one at a mall bookstore. I glanced at it briefly, and thought I (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who had the 5571 Inventory?
 
(...) I dunno. Call me crazy, but I think the prices on things like the Metroliner would go ***UP*** (not down) if LEGO made more "good sets." The more "good sets" there are in a theme, the more people want to collect that theme. The more people (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) Did you like the series at the end? I haven't met anyone who's finished Plains of Passage (is that the right name?) since it was the final (hopefully) step of the descent into trashy romance novels. I _really_ like Clan of the Cave Bear, and (...) (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
 
(...) That reminds me, does anyone know if she(1) is ever going to finish the Clan of the Cave Bear series? What's it been, nine years since the last book was published? Jeff (1) You *do* mean Jean Auel, right? (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Ninja Figs - Reverse Auction
 
(...) Spamblock. Non-RFC compliant. Bad. Nuff said. Especially in Lugnet. Jasper (26 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR