To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 702
701  |  703
Subject: 
Re: Ninja Figs - Reverse Auction
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 05:11:53 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpien@iwantnospam{Spamcake}.ctp.com
Viewed: 
175 times
  
Why do I have to be RFC compliant? Some harvester may very well visit
here and I'd rather not make it easy for it.

If people want to reach me, it's easy enough.

Jasper Janssen wrote:

On Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:04:14 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:

Drop me email at my CTP address, remove the spamblock! Mail to my
voyager address may be ignored... or may not be. Why chance it?

Spamblock. Non-RFC compliant. Bad. Nuff said.

Especially in Lugnet.

Jasper

--
Larry Pieniazek    http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ninja Figs - Reverse Auction
 
(...) Spamblock. Non-RFC compliant. Bad. Nuff said. Especially in Lugnet. Jasper (25 years ago, 25-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

6 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR