 | | Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
|
|
I guess this was in response to me, though I'm not exactly sure how. I hate to risk trying to connect it to the topic before which was based on rights and responsibilites since that doesn't seem to be the main point. So I'll take an approach (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) And some of the non-hunters as well. I personally don't hunt, don't personally care for it, but I think it's a good skill to have. And I wish all hunters were as thoughtful as Chris. Hunters indeed were the first conservationists. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
"Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FrsKE4.B4v@lugnet.com... (...) Hear, Hear I agree with you completely (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) But if it's blue, it might be on sale. Yuck! Chris (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
|
|
OK, I think I'll step in now and rant a bit. This has nothing to do with nutritional value, or anything like that, just my overall view. This'll be a long one... I hunt. Deer, rabbit, squirrel, and pheasant. Deer for the most part. Now, I've been (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
|
|
(...) do (...) are (...) I didn't contradict that. Note above that in my attempt to show what you were saying, I state that eating is a need. So it is what you said...right? (...) I agree with this for the most part. Many predatory fish will eat the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
|
|
(...) No, that's your interpretation of it, but that's not what I said. "Rights" are an artificial construct of humans so that they can better live together. Eating is a one of our most basic needs, not a right. (...) I explained why I feel they are (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
|
(...) Your claim was that the 'need' to do something (eat) granted the 'right' to do something (kill (almost) anything). But you reject the first analogy that I tried relating the hunting of deer to the hunting of people. So I tried relating the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
|
(...) To further the line of ungermane thoughts, I think it's safe to say that more people have died from club attack than nuclear weapons. I'm not sure why that seems significant at this time, but it does. Chris (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
|
(...) That may be his assertion, but I would say that nuclear weapons are the natural outcome of eons of development too. The entire time that we've been growing more efficient at eating mroe things, we've been growing more efficient in defending (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: MF at etoys.com <snipped>
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Larry Pieniazek writes: *** much editing (...) This is pretty clear. Either you are a first time customer or your not. Whether eToys should have some different checking mechanism that just checking the email address is up (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: MF at etoys.com <snipped>
|
|
(...) True, most people have multiple email addresses. That's one correct statement in the paragraph, anyway. Let's go to the eToys site, shall we: (URL) from that page (with some snippage of complete sentences...) Restrictions: This offer is valid (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Slightly OT - Microsoft Train Simulator
|
|
(...) Ya, "best-selling" because they give a copy away with every PC Gateway sells, seems like. ++Lar (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur Color Scheme
|
|
(...) The biggest terrestic sauropsid species today is the Komodo Dragon...... (...) the (...) variations in (...) Yes, because it is a selective advantage for poisonous animals to let their possible predators know that they are poisonous.... I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How big is to big?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Herzberg (...) getting a new $1.2 billon 99 gate terminal for northwest (24 years ago, 27-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: FOTY - Xmas in July
|
|
(...) These are rather sweeping statements. I find them to be an interesting contrast to something else you posted recently" "Yup. People who put down other people for their interests are just trying to boost their own egos by putting down those of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaur Color Scheme
|
|
(...) just because I'm feeling combatative, I figured I'd challenge you on this ... what recent species are you extrapolating from? Many many reptiles and amphibians display massive variation in their coloration: lizards tend to have lighter (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Violence in comics (was Re: A General Question About Castle World)
|
|
(...) It was never officially released, I beleive it got tabled after post-produciton was completed because, well, it was so heinous that parties feared it would do nothing but further hurt the image of Marvel properties as movie subjects. Which was (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Violence in comics (was Re: A General Question About Castle World)
|
|
(...) Eh... yes and no. Some of it takes place in the time after Kingdome Come. Some of it takes place in the time before Kingdom Come. I don't want to go into too much in case you read it at some point, but there is time travel involved. eric (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Violence in comics (was Re: A General Question About Castle World)
|
|
Eric Once again thanks for your insight and opinion. Good to see that you also didn't care for Liefeld (if you did I might have to stop talking to you, Ha ha). I think his copycat comic was (or is) Fighting American now that you mention it. I'd (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
