Subject:
|
Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:54:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2510 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> Or to put it another way: you go hunting with a nuke? I don't see how the
> "right" (need, whatever) to use nukes relates to killing some animal for food
> (which is what this was about).
Your claim was that the 'need' to do something (eat) granted the 'right' to do
something (kill (almost) anything). But you reject the first analogy that I
tried relating the hunting of deer to the hunting of people. So I tried
relating the 'need' to do something (eat) to the 'need' to do something else
(self-defend). I think that both are clear and valid analogies. I'm not sure
where we're getting crossed wires.
> It's a weird tangent that won't die
It doesn't seem weird though. Sorry.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
