Subject:
|
Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:26:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2166 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Hmm, just a random potshot here.
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
>
> > Essentially. One is at an extremely basic level, the other is not.
> > Inferring too much from them as a matching set is fraught with hazards.
> > Best to make the point with some other example.
>
> If what defines us is our use of tools and our ability to manipulate the
> environment instead of just react to it, both of which are due to our ability
> to reason in a self aware manner, how are a club and a nuclear weapon
> different in kind? I'd say they're not. They both multiply force, one just
> does it a little better than the other.
>
> Dunno if that helps at all, or even if it's germane, if not don't mind me.
To further the line of ungermane thoughts, I think it's safe to say that more
people have died from club attack than nuclear weapons. I'm not sure why that
seems significant at this time, but it does.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
