 | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Steve, (...) True in facts, but facts rarely enter in political debates most of the time. (...) Wow, this is the first time I heard someone mention this, I always thought the same. Fascism / Marxism / Communism is not too fr off in my book. I think (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) Libertarianism is generally considered to be strongly toward the right of the political spectrum. Not at the end, of course: there is no end. The 'political spectrum' is not a line, but a circle, with the far left colliding with the far right. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) The amusing thing being that Ronny took a paper loss that year and didn't pay income tax (which the papers had a field day with in California and why it sticks in my mind). Bruce (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
Larry, Very interesting, conservatism is close to Libertarian views? Hmm... sounds familiar. : ) ( Outside of all that Christian Right rubbish, which, for the most part, I do not agree with ) Seriously, though, very interesting interview. I keep (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) I recall that quote, actually, and I agree with it, by the way. ++Lar (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
(...) ideas (...) his (...) "Taxes should hurt" -Ronald Reagan (quote while he was governor of California) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close
|
|
This is from a 1975 interview I dug up. It's eerie, how fresh some of the ideas still sound to me. This was from when he was governor of California, before his 1976 run against Gerald R. Ford. (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Insider Trading (Was: Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
|
|
Hello Richard: There is more to this than just manipulating stock prices. Existing and new shareholders have to have some comfort that they are been treated equitably and have confidence in the stock market. Capital stock markets are one of the ways (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
(...) That is a good point, i will have to ask the legal dept about this, i will let everybody know the results And i hope i will be able to do it -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs8EnD.IDE@lugnet.com... (...) lot (...) Yes, but the Adventurers mag is not published by LEGO so copyright will be held by someone else. Huw (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
I have the fax from Lego which gives me permission to display any images from Lego, which includeds Magazines, Adverts, Comic strips, Manuals the lot really. -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
<agreed> (...) the (...) Agreed, it is one thing to post a individual page from a mag, it is another to start scanning a whole series of magazines - especially ones which are quite recent. Scott A (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) "Geeting the irrits" roughly translates to "my fingers are getting numb from too much typing and couldn't keep up with my brain, and my brain failed to register the typo". "Getting the irrits", well, I hope that clears it up. Pete Callaway (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This new subject doesn't reset the thread (Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
I'm redirecting this discussion to lugnet.off-topic.debate where I should have set follow-ups in the first place... (I think my original note was perhaps appropriate for admin, but the discussion is going to most likely be of the debate kind of (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | FUT OTD {Was: Re: This new subject doesn't reset the thread)
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) I would argue (we're x-posted to .debate now), that if anything TV should not be held as a standard for what should and shouldn't be done on LUGNET. By nature, TV is ratings hungry.. and if they think they can grab a few more seconds of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Purely a question of curiosity, what does "geeting the irrits" mean? Is it a OZism? I can guess from context and I ask because it seems a neat phrase. ++Lar (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of jan. British LEGO magazine , About the Lego Logo!!!
|
|
Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs6DAB.5xx@lugnet.com... (...) may (...) I'd be more worried about obtaining permission to host complete scans of the magazine rather than whether to blue-out the logo or not. Huw (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) Ya. I'll give your post an 80, it's got a good beat and you can dance to it. Seriously, on the main issue, is there anyone who doesn't already know what everyone's position is? The side issues(1) are somewhat interesting if we can get to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
|
(...) This would be perfectly on-topic for .market.theory, BTW, as long as it's about TLC and how it affects the market and vice-versa. If it gets into more screaming and name-calling and away from LEGO then it's probably better in (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory)
|
