|
|
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) According to the strict definition of the word, Nazi is very appropriate for the Clintons and liberals of their bent. It involves a totalitarian control of industry and the economy, and is similar to Fascism - both of which (Nazi and Fascist) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Ad hominem attacks
|
| I ran across this nosing around. I found it interesting. (URL) ask, is it appropriate for cigarette taxes to fund groups engaged in political diatribe, character assassination and compiling "enemies lists"? (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) OK. That's the first I heard about the 1984 part, but I wasn't reading that closely, I had a project plan to tweak. But what are we debating here, anyway? The subject doesn't seem to match the words. Traficant is a garden variety pol. Scott (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | HUGE NEWS FOR THE WRESTLING WORLD
|
| Waaaayyyy off Lego, but I just found this out so I had to let all the good Lugnet wrestling fans know this. ERIC BISCHOFF IS IN CHARGE OF WCW! No BS, this is absolutely true. Bill Busch sucked, and hopefully Bischoff can bring the WCW back around. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) So, he gets acquitted in a criminal case, and somehow, in civil court, he owes 100,000 to the US tax court for taking bribes? That is what is fishy, Ed. Maybe your reading on it seems a little strange, hence, fishy. Why isn't the IRS after (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) No, Guillani serves only himself and his ego, not his voting constituent. (...) one (...) And you didn't burn your LP card!!! :') (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Yes, your reading is fishy. From the article: "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the Internal (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) to (...) aquittal, (...) Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) It's not real here either. It's not real anywhere. However some newsgroup denizens do tend to view using hitler in an argument as a sign of weak rhetoric. That's been extended, in characteristic internet style, to be the joke of as soon as you (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) agree, although who can say for sure what the facts are...) "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Larry, (...) Really? I remember I got flagged by it once, by you Larry, so is it real here as well? (...) Indeed. (...) The LP party was the one who nominated Stern? Wow. That is interesting. I remember he was running for something, but I don't (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) It's not a real rule. Just a running joke. See: (URL) a "low bandwidth suitable" version of the jargon file) or (URL) original... same content, different presentation) If you want to call Guliani a Nazi that's fine by me. But I think NY would (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) from "TRAFICANT TOOK DONATION FROM WIFE OF INDICTED MOB FIGURE", or Gorgano Landscaping Company. Whether or not this company is dealing with the mob or not, it is still a legal contribution, unless I am reading something wrong here. As for (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed "Boxer" Jones <edboxer@aol.com> wrote in message news:Fru7GM.1s7@lugnet.com... (...) frequently (...) hate (...) comments? (...) ages. (...) In (...) "wench" to (...) mayor (...) last (...) Would you care to back up your "skyrocketed" claim with (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: Proof would be (...) (URL) with these (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Good idea. And remember to take those mental pills. One is prone to talk to oneself if one forgets one's medication. -Shiri FUT o-t.fun (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Wow, "goes in waves" is right!!!
|
| Frank, Ugh, let's not debate at all, outside of a few rants and raves. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wow, "goes in waves" is right!!!
|
| (...) Gee, can we go back to the religion debate? That seemed much more of a valuable debate than the current ones... (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Right. A new rule for myself: If I feel compelled to drink a Diet Coke, a Fresca, and 7 cups of coffee at work, I should not/cannot/will not allow myself to post messages until I have de-toxed. (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Make up your mind and get back to us, why don'tcha? :-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
