 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) Ok. My bad. Last time. Change that back to "wouldn't." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) err..typo: make that "would." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) I'd say that calling anyone a nazi is pretty strong language that should be used with care and restraint. By calling someone a nazi, you are accusing them of possessing the same moral character as a group that practiced the worst systematic (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
Ed, (...) Well, Ed, since i don't know the particulars on this one, why don't you inform us of it? I do remember something along the lines of congress people now being under the same laws oas we, the citizens, are. If he did not pay his taxes, he (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) Some find me very interesting, thank you. (...) man (...) him (...) and (...) How do you iron a sure? :') Qualifications: One would definitely be that you have to pay your taxes. (...) James happens to be one of the few Democrats that (...) Of (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
Ed, Boy, Ed, you sure an interesting person. (...) Boy, Ed, the ability to iron a sure sure qualifies someone to have a House seat, huh? I would love to see what your thoughts on qualifications are. James happens to be one of the few Democrats that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: [snip] And no, not all Democrats are Marxists, (How many (...) Well there's a fine figure to admire. James Trafficant, the man that took money from a "Supposed" mob-figure and then the mob (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) hehe. Debate's over so I don't have to point out that you don't have to be a Marxist to be a bad person... Hillary isn't a Marxist, but she's a bad person nonetheless. ++Lar (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
Ed, (...) Hey, she spins those letters very well! ;) (...) Well, read some books about her, look at her life, she what she believes in, read her book, it takes a government, ah, village, etc. She is a very devout leftist. And no, not all Democrats (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) always (...) to (...) [snip] (...) Re: Wench - the term was used to describe a serving woman in the middle ages. Not politically incorrect at that time. Now, it is a derogatory comment. In fact, it is a very useful derogatory comment. Vanna (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
(...) the (...) less (...) Why (...) but (...) to be (...) doesn't (...) your (...) because (...) development (...) inclusion in (...) required (...) someone (...) consider (...) unless (...) lump (...) the (...) and his (...) like (...) Ok what we (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
Hi, (...) **Note the small "n"--more on that later. (...) Yeah, but even American Indian is a name not given by the people themselves. Why not simply call Ojibwe Ojibwe, Oneida Oneida, and Cherokee Cherokee? Sure, it blows all of our (note that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
(...) Ditto-i feel that columbus' error that america was india should not be pripagated.I'm indian (as in originally from the indian subcontinent) Give the early inhabitants of the americas (Hmmm EIOAs) some credit and their own less confusing (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???)
|
|
Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <38D83277.B6E578E0@c...eb.net>... (...) it and (...) that (...) judge (...) Without a doubt, that is the seller's obvious intent. What can TLC legally do about intent?? I do not know, but my guess in this situation (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???)
|
|
Kevin, (...) infringement, because the sellers intent was to use the LEGO brand name to motivate someone to buy it. "Make Millions off of LEGO," and all that. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
|
|
(...) in (...) well written. (...) Hey, excellent pointer. Wow--all that legal stuff. I just read 99% of it and I have to agree with the decision. One statement made by the court judge that I particularly agree with is this: "If another Internet (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
|
|
(...) Some of what you say is true but I'd advocate that you, or others interested in this topic, dig a little... in .publish I believe it was someone posted an absolutely excellent pointer to a trademark case involving Clue Consulting and Hasbro. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
(...) I completely understand. Political correctness gets under my skin, also, especially when taken to the extreme. However, in this case, I think it's necessary. I mean . . . think about it. You're upset because according to the PC definition of (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | *Native* (was "Re: Future Wild West Possibilities")
|
|
Notice "Follow-Up"... (...) [screech!...] [CRASH!!!] You just hit one of my major pet peeves. *I* am a native American citizen. I am *NOT*, however, of the American Indian ethnicity!!! I was _born_ here in the US of A. _ANYONE_ who was _BORN_ within (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.western, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
My only point was that if every web browser did only and exactly what the RFC said, there would be no innovation. Even if MS had 100% of the market, we would still go above and beyond the spec. If they had 100% and they only lived by the spec, a new (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
