 | | Re: Shocking! What Do You Make of This?
|
|
(...) I thought you put the article here as an argument that men were more easily controlled by the devil than woman ;) There's plenty more evidence that male and female brain function is different. I'm often surprised that anyone is foolish to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Just pray that there isn't a mistranslation and you end up (URL) with horns>! }:-D JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Yikes! I know just enough Greek to order a Caesar Salad and to know that Pluto's moon is pronounced "Ka-ron" and not "Sha-ron." I grabbed that passage from somewhere online, but the one on my shelf is the KJV, if only because I like the sound (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) I plead the fifth. Amendment, that is--not Commandment (though, now that I mention it, I tend to be consistent with that one, too). (...) Cool! Well, if there are any plans to render me in sculpture, I hope that they get my good side. Or face (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Well, I am a newcomer apparently to this conversation, not knowing what was before and being too lazy to look it up, I was intrigued by the John 10 verse and I did look that up. First of all, I am not sure what version of the Bible you got (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shocking! What Do You Make of This?
|
|
(...) So, I assume you think nothing of it then (other than high fashion)? I happen to think that it is good evidence to support the idea of the innate differences between men and women. JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Now this IS intriquing. What were you doing in the belly of the beast? I think it's HIGH time YOU come clean and confess to the heinous crime of worship;-) (...) Hey, it could be canon for the Emergynts... {:^D JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Yeah, somehow I don't suspect that Jesus was talking about Vulcans or Wookies in that passage, but in the original thread I posed the question about "other lands" in a sort of tongue-in-cheek way, and Ryan Farrington suggested that my source (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shocking! What Do You Make of This?
|
|
(...) Mmmmm. I guess if I printed it out, I could make a nice hat? Richard Still baldly going... (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) Very astute. Indeed, I think the 'pen' thingie is very telling. What is a planet, if not a pen for the lifeforms on it. We might imagine other pens. And nothing of which I am aware suggest that ours is the first pen to which the shepherd has (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) First let me say that you are not crazy if you talk to yourself, Dave! (But you are if you listen;-) I think Jesus is clearly referring to Jews and Gentiles here. The sheep in the pen are God's chosen people, the Jews. But Jesus is obviously (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | RE: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler (URL) wrote:> (...) Hi Dave! Glad to see that your prose is as eloquent now as it was five long years ago. You should get paid by the word, if you ask me. And how did you get to be such exquisite fashion (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Shocking! What Do You Make of This?
|
|
(URL) Shocking!> JOHN (19 years ago, 18-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Look, maybe some of the people in a PA town deserve God's wrath! :-) JOHN (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Now that's what I call feigned praise! JOHN (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Bravo, I say. In so doing, Pat demonstrated loud and clear that "Intelligent Design" is in fact the fundamentalist Christian notion of creationism, thereby ending the argument espoused by ID-proponents that it's a "non-theistic" "scientific" (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Admitting he was wrong after universal outcry against him. Pat Robertson has said to many crazy things lately for me to take him seriously as a Christian. Threatening God's wrath on the people of a PA town for teaching evolution? Calling for (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Okay, now I have to give him props for admitting that he was (URL) wrrr...rrr>. JOHN (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) Sorry to disappoint. The subject line was a kind of joke-- it was (URL) recycled> for comedic effect. It was just my friendly way of tweaking some non-believing friends around here. As a Christian, I, of course, am vulnerable to the same type (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
|
(...) <<chuckle>> I have been away for a while. So I kinda walked into this one on the strength of the subject. Silly me. Can't imagine why atheists would care whether there was some bloke called Jesus padding about 2,000 years ago. Must remember to (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
