Subject:
|
Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:53:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1119 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I only posted the follow-up
because I stumbled upon the John passage
|
Now this IS intriquing. What were you doing in the belly of the beast? I think
it’s HIGH time YOU come clean and confess to the heinous crime of worship;-)
| |
| |
maybe one day
we will all read about it in the Gospel according to Dave!
|
Now that would be some serious apocrypha!
|
Hey, it could be canon for the Emergynts... {:^D
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
| (...) I plead the fifth. Amendment, that is--not Commandment (though, now that I mention it, I tend to be consistent with that one, too). (...) Cool! Well, if there are any plans to render me in sculpture, I hope that they get my good side. Or face (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
| (...) Yeah, somehow I don't suspect that Jesus was talking about Vulcans or Wookies in that passage, but in the original thread I posed the question about "other lands" in a sort of tongue-in-cheek way, and Ryan Farrington suggested that my source (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
