|
|
 | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Bravo, I say. In so doing, Pat demonstrated loud and clear that "Intelligent Design" is in fact the fundamentalist Christian notion of creationism, thereby ending the argument espoused by ID-proponents that it's a "non-theistic" "scientific" (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Admitting he was wrong after universal outcry against him. Pat Robertson has said to many crazy things lately for me to take him seriously as a Christian. Threatening God's wrath on the people of a PA town for teaching evolution? Calling for (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Okay, now I have to give him props for admitting that he was (URL) wrrr...rrr>. JOHN (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Sorry to disappoint. The subject line was a kind of joke-- it was (URL) recycled> for comedic effect. It was just my friendly way of tweaking some non-believing friends around here. As a Christian, I, of course, am vulnerable to the same type (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) <<chuckle>> I have been away for a while. So I kinda walked into this one on the strength of the subject. Silly me. Can't imagine why atheists would care whether there was some bloke called Jesus padding about 2,000 years ago. Must remember to (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I suspect that Jason Robards won't be starring in the film version of this one, though. (...) That's not always unreasonable, except when the necessary disproof is so burdensome that it becomes practically impossible. If I asserted that my (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Agreed. Kinda like the Scopes trial in reverse;-) (...) He sets up a classic error-- he has so-called proofs that he has written about that Jesus didn't exist-- he claims it is up to the other side to prove him wrong. (...) Even moreso the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) I'm surprised that this is going to court, honestly. How can you prove that someone didn't exist ~2000 years ago? The best you can do, IMO, is show that the evidence doesn't support the conclusion that he existed. AFAIC, the Gospels are (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Heads up, atheists
|
| (URL) Finally we shall soon learn the Truth> JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) Really? We were so famous, they did a (URL) about us (the handsome one is me) JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) Wait, I don't remember you guys being at my wedding.... -->The Unbeheaded King<-- (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) Sounds to me like a praying mantis honeymoon. JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) I've been to weddings like that. Dave! (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) See L. Sprague de Camp's "The Goblin Tower" (and the entire Novarian series): the king rules for some set period. After that time period, good king or bad, his head is chopped off, which becomes a grisly prize when it is tossed to the waiting (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| Why would you *possibly* limit it to politicians not in office? (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) I have it! None of this outcasts, psychotics, and losers nonsense - who cares about them? How about this: Politicians who are no longer in office get thrown in the execution pool and the lottery winner gets his/her pick to off! God, what a (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Less excellent news
|
| (...) Only my deep sense of loss in not being able to live a full and normal life. We all have our crosses to bear, no? ;-) Richard Still baldly going... (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) Do I sense some kind of deep-seated resentment here???? ;) ROSCO (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellenter news!
|
| (...) I like this. Definite potential as a revenue raiser and a crowd pleaser. But I think you might be onto something much much bigger. Think of the money and time we'd all save if we skipped the admittedly only dubiously successful process of (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Full lottery, none of this "scratcher" nonsense. Now that would be putting money where your mouth is! :-) -->Bruce<-- (19 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
