Subject:
|
Re: Heads up, atheists
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:14:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1108 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
I’m surprised that this is going to court, honestly. How can you prove that
someone didn’t exist ~2000 years ago? The best you can do, IMO, is show that
the evidence doesn’t support the conclusion that he existed.
AFAIC, the Gospels are themselves adequate evidence to conclude that Jesus the
man did exist, since it’s hardly an extraordinary claim.
Of course, even if he is shown to have existed, that doesn’t do anything to
prove his parentage...
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Agreed. Kinda like the Scopes trial in reverse;-) (...) He sets up a classic error-- he has so-called proofs that he has written about that Jesus didn't exist-- he claims it is up to the other side to prove him wrong. (...) Even moreso the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
