To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *23961 (-20)
  Bill O'Lie-ly
 
(URL) article Bill. Let me point out just a few spins from the 'no spin zone'... " Even countries like Canada are no longer dependable allies. According to a Macleans poll, 38% of Canadians say their attitude toward the USA has worsened since 9/11. (...) (20 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Freedom is freedom.
 
(...) (URL) That can't be easy>: "The army said it did not deliberately target protesters, but a helicopter and tanks had fired warning shots to stop crowds entering a battle zone. " Scott A (20 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Brickshelf pet-peeve
 
Dear self-proclaimed cool guys, Stop patting yourself on the back for the high number of hits your brickshelf folder gets!! You're getting hits because you update it with nothing evey other friggin day!!! Ahhh. That felt good. Felix (20 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: New Mecha: "Centurion" Officer Mecha
 
(...) <snipped the hissy fits> Now kids, don't make me separate you two. Let's all just check this at the door, build some cool mecha of our own styles, and have fun, eh? Bravely jumping in the middle, -Chris (note: Guys, don't take this too (...) (20 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
 
  Re: 10 year old citation
 
(...) I dunno, Lar, this looks like the kind of heavy-handed psychological tactics that Hitler would have used to shut down open debate... - Chris. (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  10 year old citation
 
Something I found from rooting around in orkut communities... (URL) to believe that it's been 10 years, almost! (20 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: ...it's Friday
 
(...) Woulda been more relaxing if some of the terrorists had bombs strapped to them. Or maybe I just didnt wait long enough.... ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Does that include the "Pop Idol" finals? Scott A (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Damm those lunatic Canadians!! btw, how did we get into such a state of affairs that the next election in Canada and the next election in the US of A are "the most important elections ever", as people are stating. Is this, what's the (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) There goes Canada again, blaming the US for its unemployment problems. You should have thought of that before you broke into Mike P's house. Dave! (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  ...it's Friday
 
It's Friday, so why not have a go at (URL) this> to help you unwind for the weekend. Warning 1: Shockwave is required. Warning 2: The message may be a little subtle. (URL) Scott A> (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Yes. I am curator for all of .off-topic, including .debate However by choice I have not done anything to the sidebar of this group (unlike .fun or .geek) (...) Yes. Send me (or Frank) a list (urls preferred) of any and all posts you want (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) omgoodness--I'm sitting in some presentation or other that has nothign to do with IS, bored out of my tree, with my laptop running, and I read this. Almost cost me my job there Dave!! ;) (...) Dave K -show me a dangerous Canadian lunatic and (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) It's the 'Murica that just grates like nails on a blackboard. But who am I to speak? I say "T'ranna" for Toronto. (...) Hey! I'm the hick here! The loud mouthed "Canada da bomb, USA SuxOrs!!" Well, no, not really. But the hick part is mostly (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Hah! If you want a good laugh, go back and find some of my early posts from 1999 and 2000--then you'll see someone who doesn't know what he's talking about. Heck, for that matter, some would likely argue that I still don't know what I'm (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) No, I really felt pretty bad about it when I posted. I shouldn't be in .debate because I don't know what I'm talking about. I have to figure out a way to get mozilla to drop the extra slash from my lugnet history entry: (URL) way the .debate (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Don, I've never thought of you this way, so I assume you are being sarcastic? I myself am very passionate about the upcoming election simply because there is so much at stake. I've watched in horror over the past 3.5 years as our government (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) NB unexpected is not the same as uncommon! (...) ...it is in the UK! So mush so that Mugabe has "banned" the BBC. Scott A (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) I don't actually like him. In fact I cringe whenever I hear him speak. Probably the born again affectations that disturb me. Anyhow, I'm not as smart as you, so I can't really put into words why he's got my vote so far. Probably it's the war (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) I figured that it was okay because we have the same name. You can bring a few more Dons into the discussion, if you'd like... (...) That's fine, but the problem is that those reasons aren't sufficient justification to invade a sovereign (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR