 | | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Let's not indulge in sophistries. (...) What part of, "it wasn't," wasn't clear? :-) The star fits over the nipple and has a hole in the middle that the nipple thrusts through (oh, hey, for a technical explanation, that turned out a bit (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) Where this falls down is in the area of expectations. We can use turning Stern off in advance of his broadcast as an effective way of not listening to what we don't want to listen to, precisely because we have an expectation already set about (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) You need to check your anatomy books. The nipple was completely exposed. What was {partially} covered was the areole - (URL) Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ Home (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) That's a local thing - I've heard songs in CA and realized for the first time that they were *NOT* recorded with silence or a bleep during obvious obscenity. Now that I moved out of CA, I get to hear silence again ;-) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) You're forgetting that you were forewarned that the half-time show was being brought to you by the letters M and TV. Even with that 'heads up', you still sit there and say "I didn't know the halftime show was going to be tasteless!"? (...) The (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: FORTUNE5.htm (...) One knows what to expect on the Howard Stern show. I don't have a problem with his show, beyond that I think it is stOOpid. One knows what to expect at the Super Bowl, and that is (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: They Know Where You Are!
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:Hvuy9o.16uv@lugnet.com... (...) So my (...) are off (...) street (...) the (...) Yea, my apartment complex really screws up these algorithms. Each apartment in the complex (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) You seem to be under the impression that american television hasn't shown bare breast before. Halftime at the Super Bowl was just an inappropriate place. I thought the commercials were far more tastless (even more tasteless than the beer they (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) (URL) we're back to Howard Stern--if you don't like what he has to say (and I don't) then for the love of freedom of choice, turn the radio station. As far as censorship goes--to that old arguement 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre is wrong (unless (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
(...) I have only recently returned from a family vacation and was content to lurk around a while, but since my name was envoked, I thought I'd comment on Alanis' behavior and the pious criticism of America's "prudishness". Let's cut to the chase, (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: They Know Where You Are!
|
|
(...) Reason is one of my fave mags... I cite from it here on a regular basis. So my opinion is of course biased but I find it well worth 15 a year. It's got a viewpoint you're not going to find very many other places, mores the pity. I have a (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) And yet at the same time, Aljazeera.net (of all places) prints this (URL) upbeat article. Is it really ALL bad news, or is that just the stuff that sells? (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote: <snip> (...) Canadians and boring kinda go hand in hand... Waittaminit... Anyway, not so much a protest against nudity, rather a protest against censorship and the furor caused by Janet's boob-- (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | They Know Where You Are!
|
|
This is way cool: (URL) worth the $15 bucks for a subscription. Subscribing by April 9th, 2004 will get you a copy: https://www.kable.co...ewsubs.asp (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) No need to find a marriage licence between Hussein and OBL. The only link neccessary is that they both posed a threat. OBL was able to carry out his evil intentions in 2001, Hussein was stopped before he was able to harm us. (...) If Iraqi's (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) Nor does he mention Washington's “inaction” at the time; did the washington not block a UN motion condemning SH? (...) No, some say it is second only to Scottish Haggis. Scott A (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) lol. By "dealings", I assume you mean give them WMD and help oppress their populations? BTW: Don't forget, SH was the "lesser of two evils" during the 1991 uprising. (...) Are you saying all post 1945 US military actions have been illegal? (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) Well, the point is that to justify his choice to invade Iraq, Dubya condemned Hussein for using chemical and biological weapons against his enemies and his own people. Dubya did not mention that these were the very same weapons and delivery (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) I’ve always thought that this was a silly criticism, true twenty years ago, during the Iran/Iraq war we supported Hussein as the lesser of two evils, you act as if we furnished his palace and rolled out the red carpet. We often have dealings (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Monkey's Uncle
|
|
(URL) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
