To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23673
23672  |  23674
Subject: 
Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:34:42 GMT
Viewed: 
629 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   http://www.reason.com/hod/nr032604.shtml

If this article is to be believed we are losing the peace quite spectacularly.

Here again the age old question, which is worse, stable but evil leaders, or democracy and instability. Similar thing happened in the Philippines, Marcos was corrupt and evil, but his regime was stable.

...and, like SH, Marcos was supported by Washington.

I’ve always thought that this was a silly criticism, true twenty years ago, during the Iran/Iraq war we supported Hussein as the lesser of two evils, you act as if we furnished his palace and rolled out the red carpet. We often have dealings with foreign leaders with whom we disagree, I really don’t see the point.

  
   As soon as he was removed chaos ensued. Now many years later, they are better off, it just took a while.

Forgive me, but I don’t remember the Philippines being invaded as part of an illegal and immoral war to remove Marcos?

First off the action in Iraq was no more illegal than any military action we have taken since WWII, including Kennedy’s Vietnam or Truman’s Korea. I personally believe that this is the most moral war we have been involved in. In a post 9/11 world the US president needs to adequately deal with all threats. He cannot simply bury his head in the sand and hope that no further innocent American lives will be lost to terrorists.

  
  
We are talking about a country that is tribal and brutal.

It has been part of the occupation plan to fragment the population (divide and conquer)... Bush sees tribalism as a benefit!

Wow, now that is spin, encouraging Iraqi’s to rise up against their oppressor is called divide and conquer.

  
   A country where regional religious leaders run gang style groups who are not afraid of lethal violence.

Is Bush afraid to use “lethal violence”? Over 10,000 civilians have now been killed; the deatils of around 700 may be found here. At the start of the week he deployed helicopter gunships in an urban area!

I heard a radio interview with the creators of Iraqbodycount.net, they are a clearly partisan group, whose research methods are suspect at best. Basically they look at all news sources for any mention of civilian casualties. They make no attempt to verify the numbers, nor to ensure that they are not double or triple counting the same casualties. They are simply morbid hearse chasers, using the event of accidental collateral damage to further their cause, truly despicable.

Secondly civilian casualties are difficult to avoid when armament is hidden in hospitals and school houses; also a challenge when men who profess a reverence for a religion hide in a mosque and shoot at soldiers from it’s windows.

  
   Also a country whose leaders tell them that cutting themselves with sabers and beating themselves with chains is a form of religious expression. Not the easiest group to assist into the 21st century.

Some of these things are a matter of culture. I’m sure they find the US porn industry just as offensive.

Agreed, although if they find US porn offensive, they would flip their lids at some of that European stuff, our porn is relatively mild.

  
  
Now some Iraqis are saying that they were better off under Hussein, which is truly no surprise as several freed blacks in this country felt more secure as slaves. A key fact that is overlooked here however, at least these Iraqis now have the right to complain about the state of affairs, with out fear of serious repercussion.


lol That is not quite true. The current Shia uprising started when Bush shut down a newspaper he did not approve of! FACT: Bush is to blame for the current uprising.

This uprising did not start with the shut down of the newspaper, although that did escalate it. I also do not believe that this uprising is completely Shia, there have been several Syrians found among the combatants. Also someone else, either Iranian or Syrian is likely financing this whole operation.

Look I am not a blind Bush kool aid drinking follower, and I do not share his optimism about the success of democracy in the middle east. It is really hard to force a group of people accept freedom, actually a dichotomy in terms. I supported this war because I agree with Bush, Blair, and all of the UN security council that Iraq posed a threat, and after 9/11 the United States can no longer afford to take any threat lightly.

Scott C.



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
 
(...) Well, the point is that to justify his choice to invade Iraq, Dubya condemned Hussein for using chemical and biological weapons against his enemies and his own people. Dubya did not mention that these were the very same weapons and delivery (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
 
(...) lol. By "dealings", I assume you mean give them WMD and help oppress their populations? BTW: Don't forget, SH was the "lesser of two evils" during the 1991 uprising. (...) Are you saying all post 1945 US military actions have been illegal? (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
 
(...) If I could stop the murder of Iraqi civilians simply by over-estimating the number of deaths, I would certainly do so. Wouldn't you? Anyway, do you have documentation for your rebuttal of Iraqbodycount's methodology? If you're correct, then (...) (20 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
 
(...) Without commenting directly on www.iraqbodycount.net, I would like to offer (URL) this> article for consideration. You'll either need to subscribe to Salon or watch a brief promotional ad from a sponser, but it takes less than a minute. The (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
 
(...) ...and, like SH, Marcos was supported by Washington. (...) Forgive me, but I don’t remember the Philippines being invaded as part of an illegal and immoral war to remove Marcos? (...) It has been part of the occupation plan to fragment the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR