 | | Re: Whoa whoa whoa!!! You two faced so-'n-so!!!
|
|
(...) I think the answer is painfully obvious. No country, esp. now that the preemptive nuclear bar has been raised -- but not even then when the means to enforce sovereignty might be at stake, can afford to allow other countries to believe they are (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
|
|
(...) Oh, really? Then why was the UN sending weapons inspectors into Iraq in the first place? Not much of a memory, Mr Marchetti. They went to verify that weapons were destroyed, not to verify whether they existed or not. (...) Who is "we"? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Whoa whoa whoa!!! You two faced so-'n-so!!!
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote: Here is the key difference, Blix was not sent in to find WMD's, he was sent in (...) And what the heck was the deal with all of the gas masks everywhere??? The argument that the WMD never existed (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Whoa whoa whoa!!! You two faced so-'n-so!!!
|
|
(...) Here is the key difference, Blix was not sent in to find WMD's, he was sent in to verify Iraq's declaration of the status of their WMD program. We mistakenly called his team "inspectors" when they should have been called "verifiers". In spite (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Blood in the Water
|
|
Because of the views of some here, I offer a more Republican take on the current scandal... Warner Seeks Release of Pentagon Iraq Weapons Report (Update1) (URL) June 6 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Senator John Warner, chairman of the Armed Services (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
|
|
(...) Not much of a memory, have you Mr. Neal? Many here doubted the WMD evidence from the first. We all laughed at Colon Powell's poor performance before the U.N. (there are even sources that claim he was angry at the doctored evidence he was (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
|
|
(...) He did have them in the eighties. We did not know if he had them now. Those things, once used, don't grow in trees... (...) Perhaps the weapons inspectors were too keen on following misleading intelligence work provided by the allies, rather (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
|
|
(...) Well, that's one way of looking at it. THen there's that truth, which is entirely a different matter-- "We have to go to war *now* because SH is a clear and imminent threat to the USofA." And, if I do recall, that the idea that Saddam had WMD (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A very frigid last name--was Re: So we're back to school yard politics...
|
|
(...) Of course, I think my dad might have you beat (since he hasn't met the Filz I met). Of course there may also be a connection, so it may be hard to know if I should really stop counting... Frank (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
|
|
(...) Look, before the war there wasn't ANYBODY who doubted that SH had WMD. It was a given; period. There is documented proof that he used them on the Kurds and killed them by the 100,000s for crying out loud! So all of this "where are the WMD" is (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
