Subject:
|
Re: Whoa whoa whoa!!! You two faced so-'n-so!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 17:41:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
126 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote:
Here is the key difference, Blix was not sent in to find WMD's, he was sent in
> to verify Iraq's declaration of the status of their WMD program. We mistakenly
> called his team "inspectors" when they should have been called "verifiers". In
> spite of his obvious anti-war bias, he had to reluctantly admit that Iraq did
> not comply with the demand for full disclosure. Blix didn't need more time, his
> job was complete, he was sent to discover if Husein was going to finally comply
> with the UN or keep playing games, Husein chose the later.
>
> Here is what I really don't understand, if no WMD's existed, why did Husein just
> comply, why not welcome inspectors with open arms and help them every step of
> the way? If he was truely innocent as you imply, why did he never act like an
> innocent man? He could have avoided this war, no matter how itchy you believe
> GWB was, if Husein had been 100% compliant, or even 75%, more nations than just
> France would have been against this action.
>
> If no WMD's are found, and no trace of them beyond those moble weapons labs I
> will be baffled. Where are they? The UN unanimously agreed that they existed,
> but no proof was given of their destruction, were they destroyed? If so why
> didn't Husein produce that evidence? Were they sold or hidden? If so to who? Did
> they never exist? If so then why did the UN unanimously approve 1441?
>
> I'm sorry but trying to justify Husein's actions makes my head hurt.
And what the heck was the deal with all of the gas masks everywhere??? The
argument that the WMD never existed simply ignores fact.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Whoa whoa whoa!!! You two faced so-'n-so!!!
|
| (...) Here is the key difference, Blix was not sent in to find WMD's, he was sent in to verify Iraq's declaration of the status of their WMD program. We mistakenly called his team "inspectors" when they should have been called "verifiers". In spite (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
