To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *12186 (-20)
  Re: Factions (and violence)
 
(...) dont (...) Well believe it or not, when the Wright brothers inveted the plane, they had envisioned it as something that would make war less violent, because they thought that it would allow generals to spy on each other and stuff, and avoid (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Frivolous lawsuits--a new winner?
 
(URL) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I would have been creating models now but the computer is acting weird.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Trevor Pruden writes: <snip> (...) 'm not sure that mass copying all of these over without adding any new text was all that useful, I think just suggesting that the thread be moved in one post probably would have (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factions (and violence)
 
(...) And more unpredictable. There aren't really "front lines" you can avoid - they'll hit just about anywhere. The horror of war that it is difficult to run from. (...) This isn't entirely accurate. It was used first as intelligence gathering (as (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: US age restrictions
 
(...) I'm sorry--I'm not quite understanding. Are you saying it's true that the buying age is 18 or 21? Dave! (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factions (and violence)
 
(...) LFB After reading your above statement I must ask, where do you teach at? After spending 4 (long) years at West Point I must say that hearing your previous post brings me back to my days as a cadet in one of my military history classes. I was (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A one time thing?/community
 
(...) I think thats what I said... Also to clarify: NELUG has debated this issue 3 times in our 2 years of existance, each time the decision was the same. We are not going to debate the issue for a fourth time in 2 years. I can't say we won't 3, 4, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factions (and violence)
 
(...) That's just swiping JFC Fuller! :) Read Fuller's treatises on air power, written just after the horror of WWI, to see how much they feared the bomber. ("The bomber will always get through", all of that.) (...) It could theoretically fire (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A one time thing?/community
 
(...) I just wanted to clarify: this issue *is* up for debate. Anyone can discuss this issue. Whether or not NELUG policy will see reform is also up for debate. Whether or not the policies of other LUGs see this rule is up for discussion. Any effort (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: All updated Keppler Industries 2.5 is up!
 
(...) Just removing the .space link (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I would have been creating models now but the computer is acting weird.
 
(...) Just redirecting to lugnet.off-topic.debate (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I would have been creating models now but the computer is acting weird.
 
(...) Just redirecting to lugnet.off-topic.debate (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I would have been creating models now but the computer is acting weird.
 
(...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: I would have been creating models now but the computer is acting weird.
 
(...) Reposting to .off-topic.debate (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factions (and violence)
 
(...) ive recently read the book _Modernity and Warfare_ by pk lawrence, in it he describes air power as the apex of modern warfare, in being both aesthetic and horribly violent. the war plane itself (be it biplane, divebomber, or stealth fighter) (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: All updated Keppler Industries 2.5 is up!
 
jeez.. you people take life way to seriously. Jesse Alan Long <joyous4god2@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GH7q7J.Cy9@lugnet.com... (...) out (...) very (...) you (...) idea (...) you) (...) to (...) have (...) too (...) names, (...) have (...) (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: All updated Keppler Industries 2.5 is up!
 
(...) (Jesse, that is J-E-S-S-E, yawns at the idle threat of Mladen.) You are too late, Mladen, every sane person HAS lost hope in me. I never had any hope to begin with in my life, always being called a loser and other such names, being considered (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: All updated Keppler Industries 2.5 is up!
 
Yeah, if anyone wants to fight about something .space is the place to be. Gary Kirby Warden <inourimage@msn.com> wrote in message news:GH6nvH.A6L@lugnet.com... (...) at: (...) does it (...) rebuild (...) did, so (...) acting (...) can (...) and (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: All updated Keppler Industries 2.5 is up!
 
Wowzers!!! Just look at all these shiney happy people... (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
 
(...) then. (...) It is oversimplifing the situation, I'll grant you that, but is essentially true. If it is illegal to purchase a firearm the only way to obtain one is to become a criminal and break the law. Of course as I stated, at present time (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR