Subject:
|
Re: A one time thing?/community
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:36:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
800 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > Therefore the 18 and
> > over rule stands not to judge anyone for any arbitrary reasons, it is a hard
> > and fast rule that is not up for debate (within NELUG, LUGNETer's can debate
> > it all they want if they wish).
>
> I just wanted to clarify: this issue *is* up for debate. Anyone can
> discuss this issue. Whether or not NELUG policy will see reform is also up
> for debate. Whether or not the policies of other LUGs see this rule is up
> for discussion.
>
> Any effort to affect NELUG policy may be fruitless, but this topic is very
> much still open for discussion.
I think thats what I said...
Also to clarify: NELUG has debated this issue 3 times in our 2 years of
existance, each time the decision was the same. We are not going to debate the
issue for a fourth time in 2 years. I can't say we won't 3, 4, or 5 years down
the road but if I were a betting man (which I am not) I wouldn't bet on it.
Eric Kingsley
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
