 | | Re: Mega-Bloks official site updated
|
|
huh??? what are future warriors, dave? ..joseph g (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Mega-Bloks official site updated
|
|
I happened to check out www.megabloks.com and noticed that they've recently jazzed up the format of the site. I runs a little slowly, but it has lots of cool info on its recent products. In an uncharacteristic move, Ritvik has actually included (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) If GoB can show they were the fisrt users (I'm not saying they do or are), does the word not belong to them? (...) I'm not sure I agree. The GOB kits (and most other MOCs) are designed in a way that economics dictate Lego can not really (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Neither of those examples reassures me it isn't just the usual corporate abuse of power and money. How different we feel when it's eBay v. Brickbay...then it's just words that should belong to everyone. I feel the same about GOB. It's just (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) doesn't appear until nearly the bottom of the page and there's some really horrible stuff there you have to read through to find it. Maggie (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Sorry Hoppy...some 10 instances found on the web (I went a bit further than Google) do not put the word into the vernacular. Citing the Windows example, now there is a word DEFINATELY in the vernacular before trademark was claimed upon (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Nope. I have used the term before. As have others... (URL) Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Well, glad you asked! (Never mind that you didn't ask ME-- any excuse to haul out my OED!) I have looked (OED Compact edition two volume set with the magnifier in the slipcase that I got at the garage sale with the Bentley for 2 bucks), and it (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
richard marchetti wrote in message ... (...) They are? I thought we made it up :-) Seriously, a Google search on "bricksmith" doesn't turn up anything that could be called "actual words being used in the vernacular".... you get lots of GoB-related (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Windows. (...) Apple Records went after them based on the word alone. (...) There's something wrong with a group of builders banding together to create guidelines for the creation and marketing of quality MOC kits? I think it was a clever (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Trademarks & Copyrights (Swimming pools & movie stars)
|
|
(...) Windows. (...) Apple Records went after them based on the word alone. (...) There's something wrong with a group of builders banding together to create guidelines for the creation and marketing of quality MOC kits? I think it was a clever (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pro Builder set?
|
|
(...) Ack, for that you'd be better off with Future Force 'mechs. Much better off, in fact. best LFB (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pro Builder set?
|
|
(...) actually kind of disappointing. It has a fair selection of chrome elements and the usual good assortment of bricks, not to mention two new wheel types and a good piece:price ratio of 255:$9.84. However, the design isn't that great, and the kit (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | New Pro Builder set?
|
|
Not my auction, and I won't be bidding: (URL) still dying to find the construction vehicles set that I've seen only once, and only on ebay. If anyone spots it, let me know! Dave! (23 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) Clone snob! :-) My 6-year-old was watching his 8-year-old brother build the Buckleberry Ferry dock with the bricks that kept falling off. After a while he turned to me and said, "Mom, it says ages 7 and up on the box, and I'm glad!" Maggie (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) My 8-year-old begged to build the Ferry set and found the same thing-- the bricks don't hold onto the bottom of the 8x16 plates well at all! BTW that reminds me, a while back when everyone was wondering about the anchor clones, I noticed that (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) I broke down and bought a few of those when they were 50% off, and I'm glad I did, because the stock has since been depleted. Nothing left but a pair of Buckleberry Ferry sets, which I'll try to grab tomorrow. I wish I could find another (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) I like the bricks, but the large plates are lame-- poor binding quality. (e.g. the plates that form the base of the two part of the Ferry bind very poorly to the bricks that form the base). Interesting colors, too. I like the flecked (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) You assume too much. Know thine enemy. LOL. (Just kidding. I've actually had one of these in my cart but haven't so far made it to the checkout with it) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Prancing Pony $7.44 at Target (Was Re: Review of LotRs Prancing Pony)
|
|
(...) Hey, at Target's 75% clearance today I managed to find a Prancing Pony Inn for $7.44 (also a Buckleberry Ferry for $3.74), so you guys may want to take a look if you get a chance (although I saw even fewer LOTR sets than I did LEGO-- these (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
