 | | Update —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | Mark Rideout has possession of Technic Box #2. Thanks, Rob (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Update —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | (...) After a week, I've picked out what I wanted and I'm going through my Technic lego box to figure out what to put in. I'll ship out the box to the next person on the list on Wed or Thur. I don't have the list at work at this time, but I'll send (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update (was: Update) —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | (...) Should note that this was for Technic Box #2. (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update (was: Update) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | Thanks for your update Mark. Wish we all could be that expedient (myself included). Rob (...) time, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update (was: Update) —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | | (...) Ok - I sent an email to Frank Filz (the next person on the list) to verify his address. I have yet to receive a response. What are the proper procedures prior to shipment? Should I still send it out the address on the list without (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | (...) Just for a follow-up, Technic box #2 was shipped out today 8/10/00 to Frank. Please update any tracking records to show that. Since Frank is on vac. I'm guessing he will be a bit slow to respond to acceptance. -mark (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Mark Rideout wrote in message ... (...) Actually, almost perfect timing. The box arrived today (the imperfectness in the timing is that it may take me a day or two to collect myself and do the trades). Frank (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Frank Filz wrote in message ... (...) I just want to mention that it could be a little extra time before I can process and send this along. See (URL) why. I'll try to get to it sometime today or tomorrow, but it could be hectic to get to the Post (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) the timing is that it may take me a day or two to (...) Ok, many many appologies for sitting on this one. In fact, the timing was not so great in that a few days after the above message, I was standing by the side of the road counting my lucky (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) Well, feel free not to send it chok-a-blok with your contagions ;-) Chris (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm probably past the contagious stage now, besides, cold virii don't last that well anywise... Is your address still the same as when Rob started the box? (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Me too. I'm done with it. Well, sort of. I'll either make two very minor trades with it for technic beams and a gear-chain (is that what we call them?) or I'll make no trades. There was nothing that I really wanted. Didn't these technic boxes (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) Well, when the box started, it was at about 5 lbs. and included pneumatics, large gears, clutch gears, and other sought-after pieces. Most people on the list have really helped the box, but others have just been a little needier than the rest (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I'm not trying to be a prick, but I'm just not sure that the two statements above are both possible. It sounds like it was a treasure trove. And now...it is better than technic box #1, and it may well have gained weight (I'm not sure). But it (...) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) It now weighs ~4 1/3 pounds. Chris (24 years ago, 24-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) now...it (...) take (...) I would be lying if I said the box box was a treasure trove. It did have "some" good pieces in it. The rest of the pieces were in there for "fill" factor. I haven't seen Technic Box 1, so I am not able to compare the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I think it is better to keep the boxes close to two pounds, I'm willing to spend $3.20 for the chance to possibly get some neat pieces. The problem on these Jambalaya boxes is that very few parts are worth paying much to get the opportunity to (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) How did that happen? I thought the original idea was not to decrease the overall general value -- increasing it is optional and considered a bonus, no? --Todd (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | | This is a general question: when the next recipient of a box doesn't respond to emails, should one move on to the next person on the list? In this case I'm trying to contact Daniel Delcollo about Technic Box #2 (Chris Weeks has it right now, before (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | | | (...) to (...) Eric, When you get the box ready to send, go ahead and send it to Paul. Just make sure he knows its coming. If Daniel surfaces, we can always send it to him later. Thanks to all for the updates. This box has taught us (at least me) a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I think there has been a general feeling that one should try and increase the value. One consideration of course is that since value is an inexact science, you probably can't make an even trade, therefore, one should generally err on the side (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) couple (...) with, (...) the (...) started (...) Frank, That may be a good idea, but... I live in Arkansas. Check local.us.ar for all the participation I've had trying to get a local club started. If I had to exchange parts from a jambalaya (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
