Subject:
|
Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 21:36:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1233 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.jambalaya, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.market.jambalaya, Rob Hendrix writes:
>
> > Well, when the box started, it was at about 5 lbs. and included pneumatics,
> > large gears, clutch gears, and other sought-after pieces. Most people on the
> > list have really helped the box,
>
> I'm not trying to be a prick, but I'm just not sure that the two statements
> above are both possible. It sounds like it was a treasure trove. And • now...it
> is better than technic box #1, and it may well have gained weight (I'm not
> sure). But it is certainly nothing to write home about.
>
> > but others have just been a little needier
> > than the rest of us, I guess (or not as generous).
> >
> > Chris, send the box to:
>
> Yeah, I wasn't fishing for a pointer, just working the details out with Erik.
> But thanks. We're having a GardenSLUG meeting in the near future and I'll • take
> it to him at that point and anyone else who wants to can trade with it before
> Erik sends it on.
>
> Chris
I would be lying if I said the box box was a treasure trove. It did
have "some" good pieces in it. The rest of the pieces were in there
for "fill" factor. I haven't seen Technic Box 1, so I am not able to compare
the two. After I do get this box back, then I can decide (through input from
you guys) what an AWESOME technic box should include. This is only my first
box, so I'm still in the learning stage of jambalaya boxes. So please, put
away your torches and garden tools (joke). Maybe next time the box will be
around 2 lbs. with nothing but the best in it. But, then, why would I want
to lose all my prized pieces...???
To Be Continued..............
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
| (...) I think it is better to keep the boxes close to two pounds, I'm willing to spend $3.20 for the chance to possibly get some neat pieces. The problem on these Jambalaya boxes is that very few parts are worth paying much to get the opportunity to (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
| (...) I'm not trying to be a prick, but I'm just not sure that the two statements above are both possible. It sounds like it was a treasure trove. And now...it is better than technic box #1, and it may well have gained weight (I'm not sure). But it (...) (24 years ago, 24-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
