Subject:
|
Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 04:28:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1753 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.jambalaya, Frank Filz writes:
> [...], especially when one is expected to increase the value. [...]
How did that happen? I thought the original idea was not to decrease the
overall general value -- increasing it is optional and considered a bonus, no?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update
|
| This is a general question: when the next recipient of a box doesn't respond to emails, should one move on to the next person on the list? In this case I'm trying to contact Daniel Delcollo about Technic Box #2 (Chris Weeks has it right now, before (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
| (...) I think there has been a general feeling that one should try and increase the value. One consideration of course is that since value is an inexact science, you probably can't make an even trade, therefore, one should generally err on the side (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update)
|
| (...) I think it is better to keep the boxes close to two pounds, I'm willing to spend $3.20 for the chance to possibly get some neat pieces. The problem on these Jambalaya boxes is that very few parts are worth paying much to get the opportunity to (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
