Subject:
|
Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:41:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1591 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Neglecting the specific nitpicking on what Mint means (and I am mightily
> restraining myself from joining in, this is just the sort of debate I
> love) do people have any issues with these descriptions?
Nope, no issues with your labels. But that's at least partly because I know
you, and I trust your judge when you say something is worthy to be described as
Mint (with any appropriate modifiers).
One more point: when dealing with toys, especially LEGO, just using a quick
label is not sufficient. Larry's auction listings are a model of accurate,
complete disclosure.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
| I'd agree with this wrap up... many eBay sellers are grossly misrepresenting stuff. They're so far off the mark that it doesn't really matter which of us is right exactly about what MIB means, it's not even close to what they say. HOWEVER, I as you (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
