Subject:
|
Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 22:01:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1434 times
|
| |
|
|
Doug Finney <dfinney@wt.net> wrote in message news:FpDEwp.GBz@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.market.auction, Mike Poindexter writes:
[snip]
>
> At least this seller gave a (presumably) honest description of the
> set's condition once you get past the title. That's more than can
> be said for a lot of sellers!
>
> Doug
Highly agreed! Although it is easy to pick a person apart on listings,
let's save our energy attacking and slandering the people who list sets
currently available at numerous places (i.e. 2000 Star Wars sets) as RARE!!!
Semantics aside, the person gave as honest a description as one can expect
from ebay.
Mike Poindexter
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
| I'd agree with this wrap up... many eBay sellers are grossly misrepresenting stuff. They're so far off the mark that it doesn't really matter which of us is right exactly about what MIB means, it's not even close to what they say. HOWEVER, I as you (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
| In lugnet.market.auction, Mike Poindexter writes: Ignoring the nitpicking (polybags and 50's/60's sets)... (...) No, I think the disagreement is more about what is in mint condition, not what mint is. The title of the auction in question was "LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
