 | | Re: Question for Todd Regarding Mark Harrison
|
|
(...) I don't think you can do that, as it is unfair to future generations of Aussie users who aren't here yet(1). But - can't you create org.au.* and move all your discussion there? I *think* organisations have more authority over the type of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for Todd Regarding Mark Harrison
|
|
(...) Richard is correct! The no-auction rule (that is to say, no auction spam outside of .market.auction) is a LUGNET-wide rule -- it's part of the very basic core Agreement, in fact. Getting together and agreeing somehow agreeing spontaneously (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | .org.au.*
|
|
(...) Well, according to EricK's latest map of the Australia/Oceana area, (URL) are actually two groups now for Australias -- LegOz and Studs. If you wanted newsgroups/mailing-lists for these in the lugnet.org.* hierarchy of groups, here's how (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
(...) created/grown (...) Hi Todd, LegOz and STUDS are one and the same at the moment. We're having more problems than the TORAL's when it comes to what we're called We're hoping other people in other capitals will get togethera and form groups (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
(...) OK, time for a different approach. Feel free to flame/praise me as you see fit. At the very least we need to keep the following groups; lugnet.loc.au.act lugnet.loc.au.nsw lugnet.loc.au.nt lugnet.loc.au.qld lugnet.loc.au.sa lugnet.loc.au.tas (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
(...) I think Loc.au.tas.hob should be added to this list, just to maintain the capital cities theme. (...) Yes this is pertinent to all of Lugnet. (...) *nod* and further additions to lugnet.org.au.* as more groups are formed. (...) The NSW in this (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
(...) Hear Hear Santosh! Sounds like a great idea, keep an eye on loc.au for newbies, and post to loc.au.org. Yeehaa! our own Legoz group where we can sell to and buy from fellow Aussies to our hearts content. Perhaps if we want anything not avail (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote (...) <<snip most worthy Lugnet flexibility>> (...) Cool. Studs is actually getting together this weekend. We'll work our what we'd like to do and post. In the meantime, thanks for keeping an eye out for (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
"Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote (...) <<Nods>> One for each state and territory in the commonwealth ... I'm with you. Good plan. (...) some (...) <<raises an eyebrow>> I'm cool with this, but I'm not sure it contributes. Its hard to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .org.au.*
|
|
(...) Merely a suggestion. I'd be quite happy to see these groups shut down and everything moved up to the state/territory subgroups under loc.au. I just don't think we have the volume of traffic nor the demographic spread to justify anything more. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for Todd Regarding Mark Harrison
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) agreeing (...) That's fair enough, but taking how other NG's evolve and divide into consideration, I think that it's reasonable that compartmentalisation of the buy-sell-trade NG could be desirable for the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
