To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 1550
1549  |  1551
Subject: 
Re: Poll on name of national group (Was Re: SO WHAT LOGO AM I DESIGNING????)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:55:52 GMT
Viewed: 
656 times
  
In lugnet.loc.au, Deidre Rushton Brumby writes:
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter White writes:
This one is up for grabs, let's call for submissions from EVERYONE.
I'll start off with variations of the obvious...
1.LegOz
2.OzLUG
3.AUSTLUG
4.LUGOz

I like LegOz although the "Leg" bit stands out a bit and may give
the impression it's some strange fetish, but that's not a big enough
gripe to not go with the name.  LUGOz is good too but may give more of
an impression that the group is more associated with LUGNET whereas I
take it we'd be encouraging non-net savvy Lego fans too?  OzLUG and
AUSTLUG are well, neither here nor there.

If you're confused after reading that about which I'm going for,
that would be 1. LegOz.

BTW Studs is a good name, but I'll forevermore secretly think of you all
as Slugs! :) :)

C'mon Deidre, thinking caps on namewise, I was just kicking the debate off.

We know we are not Studs !
We have a strange suspicion we might be Slugs though :^(

pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>



Message is in Reply To:
  Poll on name of national group (Was Re: SO WHAT LOGO AM I DESIGNING????)
 
(...) I like LegOz although the "Leg" bit stands out a bit and may give the impression it's some strange fetish, but that's not a big enough gripe to not go with the name. LUGOz is good too but may give more of an impression that the group is more (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR