Subject:
|
Re: SO WHAT LOGO AM I DESIGNING????
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jun 2000 06:35:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
720 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter White writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Kevin Hall writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Peter White writes:
> > > In lugnet.loc.au, Kevin Hall writes:
> > > > OK....I've been trying to keep up with all the posts.....
> > > > As you all know, I'm willing to lend my designing skills and equipment, for
> > > > any logos or designs for us lego fans, I was going to work on some more • this
> > > > weekend....BUT....I need to know what I'm designing...????
> > > > What is the Australia Wide organisation going to be called....???
> > >
> > > This one is up for grabs, let's call for submissions from EVERYONE.
> > > I'll start off with variations of the obvious...
> > > 1.LegOz
> > > 2.OzLUG
> > > 3.AUSTLUG
> > > 4.LUGOz
> > >
> > > > And is our group (STUDS) still called STUDS....???
> > >
> > > Absolutely still called STUDS, just ignore my grumbling :^0
> > > It was voted in at LegOz 2000.3
> > >
> > > > And if any other organisations need any logos designed...cause thats what I • do
> > > > in the real world....!!! : )
> > >
> > > pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> email to here
> >
> > OK...STUDS it is....so is every1 in STUDS happy with the logo so far.....I
> > might just do some varients of the one existing OK....
>
> I thought the logo you had was ideal, in fact I would be happier when doing
> public shows with this on handouts/banner pages.
>
> > As for Aust wide,
> > LegOz sounds good to me....short....simple...and says everything....
>
> My NLSO opinion was she couldn't stand Oz used in any way as an attachment,
> as it's used in sporting language. I'm sort of indifferent.
> We need opinions from our other-state readers, if they have recovered from
> this weeks' loc.au debates.
>
> pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
My only gripe with LegOz is that it sounds too close to Legoes/Legos/Legos'.I
never refer to Lego as "Legos". Appart from the "official" line from TLC that
their product should not be reffered to as Legos but simply Lego-singular and
plural, it's always sounded wrong to me.
But, as I've tried to make up something different without success, LegOz
best describes what it's about and where it is. (unless the only Oz you know
about has a yellow brick road and some wizard dude living there :)
Braith.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SO WHAT LOGO AM I DESIGNING????
|
| (...) I see your point. But this depends on how you pronounce LegOz... Is it "Lego <break> Oz" or "Leg - Oz"? Unless you pronounce "Oz" to make it sound like "oats", neither way should be a problem... Usually, when combining words like that, it's (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SO WHAT LOGO AM I DESIGNING????
|
| (...) I thought the logo you had was ideal, in fact I would be happier when doing public shows with this on handouts/banner pages. (...) My NLSO opinion was she couldn't stand Oz used in any way as an attachment, as it's used in sporting language. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
