Subject:
|
Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 01:16:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1256 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Tim Courtney writes:
> > "Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qAoF.I02@lugnet.com...
> > > In lugnet.lego.direct, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > > In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott A wrote:
> > > > I was very encouraged that Brad took the time to post a *public* message,
> > > > updating us all on the status of things. This is a very good sign, IMO.
> > >
> > > I remain sceptical.
> >
> > What you're doing is remaining a thorn in the side of a dedicated group of
> > people who are trying to do _you_ a service.
>
> OK, just tell me what the party line is and I'll make a point of never
> questioning it.
>
> Scott A
OK. One more time. Let's all remember this, the offical party line is:
Send me all your Lego pieces.
There, that should do it. Let's party.
-- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
| (...) TK, just need a clarification-- do we send all of our LEGO to *you*, or is the party line an admonition to the world to send *us* their LEGO? (...) Speaking of a good time, I was just thinking about how nice it will be in AZ pretty soon-- I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
| (...) Sorry, I did not mean to have my comments construed as a personal attack. I 100% accept that my post was rather pointless, my reply to Steve was meant to be a rhetorical question which infers that my post was not the only pointless one on (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
