| |
Yea well I'll still take my Galaxy Explorer over any current LEGO set. Now
over some people's own mocs, that's another question. :-P
--Kyle
http://lego.kepplah.com
In lugnet.lego.direct, Paul Hartzog writes:
> in general response to this thread....
>
> i hate juniorization as much as the next guy
> but i don't buy those sets.
>
> The new SW sets are the BEST sets TLC has ever
> made, the curved pieces (finally) allow for
> stylish mocs, and the canopies can be placed
> side by side w/out trans walls between them.
>
> AND
> I grew up w/ lego and classic space
> (i have every space set from like '74 to '86)
> and most of the folks who complain about
> current TLC policy NEVER HAD THOSE SETS.
>
> well, they mostly suck. really. as someone
> who had them, had a dark ages, and came back
> to lego, I can say that I build almost entirely
> with my sets AFTER '95. The pieces are better,
> more interesting, more useful, etc. There's
> only so much you can do w/ a freaking BRICK.
> And i never liked spaceships that look like
> a blue box w/ grey wings.
>
> A lot of this is just nostalgia, and I will NEVER
> part w/ my old lego. In fact, I'm rebuilding all
> the my classic stuff from the ORIGINAL PIECES.
> I recently sorted those pieces (which are separate
> from my current lego collection) and in the ENTIRE
> 12 Year span of pieces, I found less than 100 pieces
> that were actually useful...
>
> ... unless you want to make a blue box w/ grey wings.
>
> :-D
>
> -paul
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | an alternate opinion
|
| in general response to this thread.... i hate juniorization as much as the next guy but i don't buy those sets. The new SW sets are the BEST sets TLC has ever made, the curved pieces (finally) allow for stylish mocs, and the canopies can be placed (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
