 | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Matt Hein
|
| | | (...) It's kind of funny how the newer generation of kids (action addicted) don't appreciate Lego's core values. Sets with high ratios of specialty parts appeal to them, while basic models, such as Castle and Space don't appeal at all. It's quite (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | (...) I have to agree with you. Redemption is sweet.:-) Anyway, speaking of liscences- when does Lego's contract about Star Wars expire? I would much rather see classic space and Blacktron than the current new Star Wars sets. John Kruer (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | (...) I don't exactly know the answer to that officially...I'm assuming that they got a 9 year (3 film) license considering that they are issuing out models for Star Wars II: Attack of the Clones. That is my best guess. You are right classic space (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Darren Townsend
|
| | | | | | This is one of the most interesting debates I have read for a while, and I feel the need to put a couple of points forward. Regarding the topic of big parts vs. bricks, I agree that there are a lot of sets out there that look like they could be (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | (...) Hopefully, the contract should expire in 2003.And if it does, prepare yourself for a Space Legend set. Personally, I want to see either Cosmic Fleet Voyager, 918 Space Transport or a good old Message Intercept Base as Space legends. Or even (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'd LOVE to see a MIB as a set. I worry that they may not have the tooling for the linear actuator (rack) parts though. (in this set they are the parts that provide the linear motion that opens and closes the large base halves) This URL should (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yeah. Those are a few sets I've always wanted, but never got a chance to acquire. Hopefully, LEGO should release a Space Legend in the near future, if they EVER do. :) If Lego couldn't make the tooling, do you think it would be be possible for (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | | (...) The contract was to have the rights to produce Star Wars sets. Brad Justus, senior VP of LEGO Direct, said at BricksWest in no uncertain terms that there is no contractual reason not to produce any Classic Space Legends sets. However, there (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yes that was the Company hogwash he recited. I work in a toy store. Life on Mars sets come in boxes printed; LEGO(the logo) SPACE. So the company's official position is that space sets at retail are ok but Lego Direct isn't allowed to release (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | an alternate opinion —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | | | in general response to this thread.... i hate juniorization as much as the next guy but i don't buy those sets. The new SW sets are the BEST sets TLC has ever made, the curved pieces (finally) allow for stylish mocs, and the canopies can be placed (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: an alternate opinion —Rick Clark
|
| | | | | | | Well said! If I may add a few comments: (...) I'd like to chime in here to remind people that juniorization of LEGO System sets should not be confused with the introduction of the quick-build Jack Stone sets. JS sets allow LEGO to provide simpler (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: an alternate opinion —Scott E. Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | Paul & All, I have given up any hope of getting my work done today, so I will come in this weekend. : / Anyway, I saw this thread and wanted to put a few comments here: (...) Right. (...) There are some good sets here, and some bad ones. But there (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: an alternate opinion —Scott E. Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | To All, I am sorry about the last post in this thread, I wanted to re-direct it away from LEGO Direct group, and turn it to space, where I think it should be, or at least SW. My apologies. : ) Scott "Always Lost in Space" S. -- (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: an alternate opinion —Kyle Keppler
|
| | | | | | | Yea well I'll still take my Galaxy Explorer over any current LEGO set. Now over some people's own mocs, that's another question. :-P (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: an alternate opinion —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | | | "Paul Hartzog" <panarchy23@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GssMxF.990@lugnet.com... (...) I could see what you're saying about old Space, but I'm not a Space collector. I collect Town, and there's no comparison with Town sets of the past (my (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —Mychal Zimny
|
| | | | (...) but (...) Lego's contract with SW ends in 2007. I'm inclined to agree, I love the SW line but I wish Lego hadn't sold their soul to Hollywood like so many other toy companies. (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter.. —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | (...) UGGG! I'll be an adult by that time! Honostly... I guess bricklink will be in a boom for the space trade. John Kruer (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
