Subject:
|
Re: In the shadow of bent trees
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 23:06:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
546 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Can anyone else confirm that the new cypress trees are no worse than the
> older cypress trees? We could probably just accept Maggie's sole opinion on
> this, but I'd like to hear it from someone else too. [Maggie's *just* a
> girl, after all, so she may not be as uptight about it as us guys might
> be...=oP]
Tell ya what Richard, I'll bring both old and new trees along to our next
trade, and after I'm done setting you straight about the above remarks you can
take a look at them and judge for yourself! :-D
Maggie (who has found a second old tree to further support the claim that there
is no difference)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: In the shadow of bent trees
|
| (...) Now, y'see here, this is the problem: I can only be certain that there's no difference by how they feel to *chew*. Yes, you heard me right, chew. I gnawed up my ONLY CYPRESS TREE many years ago, and it's now long-vanished, or if it's still (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: In the shadow of bent trees
|
| (...) Can anyone else confirm that the new cypress trees are no worse than the older cypress trees? We could probably just accept Maggie's sole opinion on this, but I'd like to hear it from someone else too. [Maggie's *just* a girl, after all, so (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
