| | We want to know what you think!
|
|
Greetings! I am posting as your friendly neighbor LEGO Direct rep/AFOL again to let you all know that we have launched a new part of www.LEGO.com. As some of you may know from Brad's mention at Brickfest, the new Your Opinion site is now live at: (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
I tried to not to check any boxes for the ages of my children (as i have none) and since "i have no children" wasn't an option.... think that could be added for us childless AFOLs? :) (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
"Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:GGoIDK.48I@lugnet.com... (...) Can I say that was the best thing you could have done. Great to have an opportunity to make some input. Great to see what other things folks are (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) sorry - couldn't use it, since it requires java. Shame to _require_ something that's there just for looks. (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | RE: We want to know what you think!
|
|
Jake The first question does not have the choice " Jake sent Me "! :-) Thanx, Mark Millère LUGnet # 525 Visit Milissa's LEGO store, Millère's Spares (URL) -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Apparently one must have children to answer the product survey. Strange, since it gives "Self or another adult" as a choice for the question of who you primarily buy for. (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Is there a way to just see results without retaking the survey? (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
Jake McKee wrote in message ... (...) opinions (...) This is good, but has some limits I ran into - for example, I was only allowed to add 2 new ideas in the shopping section. It also seems strange that the "other peoples ideas" I was given to vote (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) I was gonna say the exact same thing!! -Shiri (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Good job, but I don't like how you only give some of the opinions to choose from (random selection?). I'd rather see them all, so as not to make new and uneccessary additions. Let us vote on, say, up to one-third of the total opinions... (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) I don't like it too much either, but it does make sure that new suggestions don't suffer the "last on a list of 1000's" problem. It also means that results can exist where 5 of the top 10 answers can be "we want bulk bricks" :) I was going to (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) snip (...) OK - I filled out my survey on the Lego Products - here are my top 3 suggestions (everyone feel free to vote for them!): - I asked them to bring back the entire Blacktron I theme and how about a Blacktron III theme. - I said that I (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Jake, The why did you visit LEGO.com question is loaded. I went to the LEGO site to give my opinion, not to checkout prices or anything like that. Since I did not feel any of the answers were appropriate I could not continue. There should be (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
Great idea, make sure you act on the results :P keep it up James "Jake McKee" <jacob.mckee@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:GGoIDK.48I@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) now (...) opinions (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) I re-used the opinion site today and there was a selection for no children... Benjamin Medinets (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Excellent! Thanks LD! I have to go back anyway, since one of the 3 options "disappeared" from my screen, and i wasn't able to take the 3rd one. (i blame ns6 - i still can't believe ns let them put their name on this piece of... ) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) I'd like to say the same thing...it seems that each person gets a random of 10 comments from the list of feed-backs each time and then gets to vote on the importance of 5 of them.... I think this type of voting system really isn't accurate of (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
Great idea on having a feedback forum for Lego Enthusiasts.... here is a problem which I view pretty huge... I think there is a lot of "What is Lego going to bring to my favorite theme" ...and "How come that theme got that, while my theme only got (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Wow, sounds like quite a few of you are giving us your feedback! That's terrific! There have been a couple of questions that have popped up about how the survey works, and some issues with the survey itself. Let me try to address them as best (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) As a survey, it's a bit flawed (see the cogent earlier comments) but I filled it out anyway. The best part is that the 'no children' option was added. As a result of feedback? The Slashdot model of self-moderating content is a bit more potent (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Maybe I've been taking too many CS courses lately, but I don't think "both randomly and logically selected" makes much sense. Anyway, I don't trust the random number generator that the back end is using for this "randomness": in the first part (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) Thanks, Jake & all for this opportunity for your customers to be heard. In the past, quite often phone representatives have told me that The Lego Company does not take outside ideas. I think you are all moving in the right direction here. One (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
|
| | Re: We want to know what you think!
|
|
(...) I don't think a computer programmer would have phrased it, "randomly and logically", but if the system tries to (logically) give each idea the same amount of face time, and does so by selecting (randomly) from the pool of ideas that have not (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|