 | | Re: Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
|
|
It would appear that they're the same as in Europe, however, that still doesn't explain or justify the extreme smallness of the discount amount, especially given the higher cost of postage us Aussies have to put up with. Which is my reason for, as (...) (19 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
|
|
Question: Are the specials we are getting the same as those that europeans are getting? If not, that is definatly a reason to complain. (19 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
|
|
I am looking at the specials on the LEGO Shop At Home website and I simply cannot believe the poor quality of the specials listed on the site. For instance the 10021 USS Constellation has been marked down from the original price of $99.95 to a (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | S@H catalog on google
|
|
Dunno if it's been mentioned before, but the S@H catalog is now available at google.com: (URL) you should go via (URL) as the above URL will probably change for each catalog. They also have past catalogs available via that link, back to Sept 2001. (...) (20 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | An open letter to TLG.
|
|
I am writing this because I wish to know why TLG are downsizing colors instead of thinking why can't they utilize mass-production of colors in more colors? It seems irrational that they would produce colors in certain rare element and production run (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?)
|
|
Judging by the reactions (or lack of) to my suggestion to move the page to a subdomain called l3go, I guess it'll be ok... Or is it? Last chance to complain before I commence the moveingprocess. Cheers NB (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: false advertising on shop.lego.com?
|
|
(...) "Not Available In Any Store (except the official Lego stores don't count)" -Scott Lyttle (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) What about www.lego.si ? There is a company called LEGO d.o.o. (d.o.o. would mean I guess Ltd. - Limited responsibilites) in Slovenia... Saso from Slovenia (20 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: false advertising on shop.lego.com?
|
|
(...) They were in stock at the Big Shop at LLCA on Sunday at the LEGO store in the Glendale Galleria (CA) on Monday. The former were 20% off for annual/life pass holders, BTW. -Ted (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.lego.direct, FTX)
|
| |
| | false advertising on shop.lego.com?
|
|
I just accessed shop.lego.com and it said "10030 Imperial Star Destroyer: Not Available in any store" This is not true, it is available in Daved Jones stores here in australia (AFAIK), therefore this is false advertising (and may contravene the (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) What about: www.oldlego.com It exists. Gary Istok (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Grey zone debate wanted! (was: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?)
|
|
Well, I believe that that big grey zone is there because the people at TLC is just as uncertain on how to place the boundary as we are; not to terrorize us with having a secret boundary to sit behind anxiously waiting for the opportunity to punish (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
Hallo Ronald, (...) We had that already, it is now called BrickOS. Jürgen (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) I disagree - both about using "l3go" and about greater restrictions. Pushing towards an edge means that TLG will need to delinate it more clearly - which means less grey area. as for the "l3go", i think your average user would think something (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
Hello Niels, (...) To me a name as l3go seems like getting as close to the edge as possible. Prehaps it's just (bearly) enough to be legal (but I'm not even sure about that), but it's certainly against the spirit of the rule. Looking for the edge (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
You'll notice the dead trademark is for computer game rights. They obviously decided a jack stone computer game wouldnt sell. [should probably change follow up but no idea where it should go] (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) Hi Jake, thanx for your comments but there are still some unclear points: "lego" as a word is clearly registered by the company and therefor cannot be used in domain or subdomain names. But "lego" as part of a word should not be registered in (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) Pretty interesting reading in the search, glad the name JIM SPACEBORN didn't stick around. Jack Stone might have died but they relisted it later as Live, so it's still here to stay for a while. jt (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
(...) What about OGEL, 0931, 1390 or such? These are not their trademarks, at least I haven't found them on USPTO. You can search their trademarks here (URL) enter 'Kirkbi' and 'Owner name'. Heh, I've seen there: Jack Stone - Dead. ;-))) Jindroush (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego in subdomains, legal or not?
|
|
Dear all First of all I'll thank Jake for settling the question wether lego in subdomains is legal or not. Secondly I'll thank everybody (and especially Michael) for taking the time to explain why: Being immersed in the busienss of domain names and (...) (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
