 | | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) I'm glad there are people like Larry who are less bummed out. I don't want anyone to be as bummed out as I am. But I'll try to clarify my prev post. I know my views are often critical -- I'm like that. Usually I bite my tongue in this news (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: New plastic "rubber" tire substitutions
|
|
(...) So what looks like black 30.4x14 hubs with rubber tires on the picture is really a one piece molded plastic part with a hollow backside? This is really bad in my opinion. And to think that I was looking forward to the black hubs in this set. (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW 2001 sets (Scuplture Dragon! and HTO stuff among)...
|
|
(...) Agreed. Simple packaging sends a "this is serious stuff" message and keeps costs down too... look at how low run Model Railroad kits are packaged. ++Lar (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Pardon my ignorance, but who is Blair? Thanks, ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) D.L. Blair is a marketing company. One thing they do is do the initial stages of contest (qualification based winnowing) judging, or when it's a contest in which the winner is randomly picked, carry out or supervise the random draw from all (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
"Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:G6Lz7K.BwE@lugnet.com... (...) building (...) being (...) no big (...) fine (...) Any idea as to whether these competitions will be open to the whole world, or just USA? regards lawrence (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | D.L. Blair, Inc. (was: Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation))
|
|
(...) D.L. Blair, Inc. is a consumer sales promotion agency headquartered in New York and Nebraska (USA). Their clients include Procter & Gamble, Coca Cola, and Miller Brewing. LEGO has been using D.L. Blair since 1995. They also handled the Star (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.build.contests)
|
| |
| | Re: D.L. Blair, Inc. (was: Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation))
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G6nGGG.H0p@lugnet.com... (...) Hmm...what a terribly designed slow loading site for a company that does so much business with such large clients. One of the pages even said something like (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New plastic "rubber" tire substitutions
|
|
(...) Yes, these are hollow 1 piece ABS wheels (32146). They first appeared last year in the 3057 Create 'n' Race set. I suspect the reason that they are in the 8241 set is cost. After all it would be hared to expect 8 real tires in a set that only (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New plastic "rubber" tire substitutions
|
|
(...) ... (...) Thanks for the heads up; I was actually going to purchase this set specifically for the black wheels (without the tires); since they aren't seperated from the tires they're of little use to me. D'oh. I may still need black wheels (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Lego SAH ....c'mon already
|
|
Having placed a substantial shop at home order earlier today, I remembered references to a $39 price on the Droid Development Kit, so I asked what the current price was for that item. I was quoted the $59 price so I passed. Lo and behold, I received (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Surely this is not legal
|
|
G'Day Looks like this auction has been pulled by eBay, I guess the lawyers have been busy..... Cheers Oliver Play Well "r2" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:G6Fy7w.EsK@lugnet.com... (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
LEGO is giving you the opportunity to build something you love and to show it off to everyone while they stand proudly behind you. You want to moan and complain about that? Ashamed you all should be. Build On! (or not, if the Official Rules say you (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
"Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:<G6MMIy.MrI@lugnet.com>... (...) here (...) contest (...) for (...) see (...) Suz, I mentioned something about an "MOC of the Year Award" type contest a few weeks back. See (URL) . When (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego SAH ....c'mon already
|
|
(...) It's not deliberate on their part. All the catalogue offers are keyed to the catalogue code (on the back, in the yellow brick). If they don't have that code, then they will see only the default price, and not the special offers from that (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
I do not think most of us want to make any money off our creations, but should we have to give up all rights to our work? Do other contests that judge artistic creations require that the artist relinquish all rights to the creation? (Really, I (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) big (...) fine (...) to (...) I think the issue with TLG may be litigation avoidance. If LEGO receives a bunch of ideas and designs but does not obtain the rights then they must check every new design they market against the entries to insure (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Although I haven't thought about LUGNET's specific involvement, I couldn't agree with you more about contests. Recently I've been giving this great consideration and I believe such events can do many positive things both for individual (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Thanks for the insight Suz. I couldn't agree with you more! There is no way I would ever give up ownership on a design I did. Although I am not a train buff, I really do marvel at the wonderful MOC's that they create. Gary Istok (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Good point. Combining subthreads... would a non exclusive royalty free license granted at entry solve that problem? IANAL so I am just guessing wildly but I think it might. I have to reiterate my opinion that I feel the disparagement of this (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
