Subject:
|
Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.harrypotter
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 03:27:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2689 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.harrypotter, John Morgan writes:
> In lugnet.harrypotter, Richard Marchetti writes:
>
> > You have the beginnings of a good idea, but I am not sure your current
> > suggestion would work for the top-most stair (unless I misunderstand what
> > you meant). What is your attachment point on the top stair?
> >
> > I can certainly see some possible solutions, but they might not look that
> > great anyway...
>
> This all depends on your building's structure, but assuming you have the
> stair case leading to a second floor landing, etc., a jumper brick (or other
> mechanism)could a) be extended from a few bricks beneath your second floor
> and behind the stairs, or b) be extended from a wall beneath your second
> floor and behind the stairs.
>
> The second floor plate would, of course, be held in place in the
> conventional manner.
>
> This method should hold the stairs reasonably steady and should not be
> unsightly.
>
> I would post pics of the model if i had a digital camera, but alas, I have
> yet to acquire one.
This issue was an easy fix, and will make the stairs not slide at all.
Of course what WOULD have been nice was for Lego to have the bricks where
they do not slide. Oh well.
P.S. I know what you mean, Pic isn’t necessary
Doyle
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
|
| (...) This all depends on your building's structure, but assuming you have the stair case leading to a second floor landing, etc., a jumper brick (or other mechanism)could a) be extended from a few bricks beneath your second floor and behind the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
