To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.harrypotterOpen lugnet.harrypotter in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Harry Potter / 978
977  |  979
Subject: 
Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.harrypotter
Date: 
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:27:30 GMT
Viewed: 
2770 times
  
In lugnet.harrypotter, Richard Marchetti writes:
John:

You were right in the essentials, you can certainly use a plate beneath the
lowest step, and then a short series of plates descending to the uppermost
step to lock the staircase into place (without getting fancy, you'd need a
minimum of three stacked plates of some kind, ending in 1x2 plate where one
stud is being used to hold the uppermost step in place). In this
configuration there is still some movement, but not as much as without these
plates.

Good save for crummy elements.

-- Hop-Frog

Your missing the point, it isn't the sliding, it is that some pieces, 26% in
my case where a totally different key system and when using these bricks
they leave major 1/16th in. gaps in between the steps.

Lego is already planning to replace them and find what may be the problem.

368, 270 good ones and 98 bad ones, that is a High %, plus when devided by
23 sets, they dont devide. Its almost fact that these pieces are not so much
defective, but the wrong piece.

You could make good rotors for Planes et with these other bricks, personally
I think they just got mixed up in packaging.

Doyle



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
 
(...) No, you are missing the point. This is a subthread we are onto in this branch of the thread -- the subject had become how to improve the freely moving step configuration, and John had an excellent, even elegant, solution. Your originating (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem???
 
John: You were right in the essentials, you can certainly use a plate beneath the lowest step, and then a short series of plates descending to the uppermost step to lock the staircase into place (without getting fancy, you'd need a minimum of three (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR