To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.harrypotterOpen lugnet.harrypotter in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Harry Potter / 962
    Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Richard Marchetti
   Doyle: (...) Amongst my elements for the spiral staircase, I note that there may be two kinds of stair elements: one with approx. 1/2 the overhang of the other which is itself quite wide. I am not sure that this is a defect per se, as I am pretty (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
     (...) I think you miss my point? The ones with the _l_ point away from the triangle are the ones that wont over hang or slide to far. The ones with the groove pointing toward the triangle are the ones that really only work, by placing them 180 (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Richard Marchetti
     Hmmm, I am not really sure what you are getting at -- all I see is that some of the stair elements seem to be designed to stack with slightly different rotations, either slightly left or right. This discrepancy doesn't change the utility of the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
     (...) Take a look at this pic. And you'll see what I mean. Just click the stair.gif (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
     (...) I myself own two of the spiral stairs and they are without the wrong type stair-elements. Kind Regards, Ben (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
      (...) NP, I though they were defects, this porves it for sure, because everyone woud have them if they were suppose to. Doyle I hope others dont find out what I did! I had 98 Stairs pieces that were bad. And still more on there way. (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
     
          Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —David Eaton
       (...) I also have two sets of stairs (32 total steps, I guess?) none of which had any problems-- how many NON-defectives do you have? IE what percentage of your steps were faulty? Did you buy them retail? From S@H? DaveE (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
     
          Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Kyle Beatty
      (...) Harry Potter ... Harry Potter ... the Harry Potter with the scene with the <i>moving stairs?</i> (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
     (...) NP, I thought they were defects, this proves it for sure, because everyone would have had them if they were suppose to. Doyle I hope others dont find out what I did! I had 98 Stairs pieces that were bad. And still more on there way. (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —John Morgan
   (...) If you have the non-defective stairs, a jumper brick placed directly below both the bottom and top-most steps should secure the staircase in place. (There are probably other schemes that would also work as well or better, but a jumper brick (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Richard Marchetti
   (...) You have the beginnings of a good idea, but I am not sure your current suggestion would work for the top-most stair (unless I misunderstand what you meant). What is your attachment point on the top stair? I can certainly see some possible (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Richard Marchetti
     John: You were right in the essentials, you can certainly use a plate beneath the lowest step, and then a short series of plates descending to the uppermost step to lock the staircase into place (without getting fancy, you'd need a minimum of three (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
     (...) Your missing the point, it isn't the sliding, it is that some pieces, 26% in my case where a totally different key system and when using these bricks they leave major 1/16th in. gaps in between the steps. Lego is already planning to replace (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
    
         Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Richard Marchetti
     (...) No, you are missing the point. This is a subthread we are onto in this branch of the thread -- the subject had become how to improve the freely moving step configuration, and John had an excellent, even elegant, solution. Your originating (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —John Morgan
   (...) This all depends on your building's structure, but assuming you have the stair case leading to a second floor landing, etc., a jumper brick (or other mechanism)could a) be extended from a few bricks beneath your second floor and behind the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —Doyle Nelson
     (...) This issue was an easy fix, and will make the stairs not slide at all. Of course what WOULD have been nice was for Lego to have the bricks where they do not slide. Oh well. P.S. I know what you mean, Pic isn’t necessary Doyle (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
   
        Re: Anyone else notice the stair problem??? —John Morgan
   In lugnet.harrypotter, John Morgan writes: Oops, sreplied to the confirmation a little late (I hate that thing), oh well. (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR