Subject:
|
Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 12:34:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@nomorespamNOVERA.COM
|
Viewed:
|
772 times
|
| |
|
|
Rob Doucette wrote:
> The 8440 has the same suspension setup on both front and rear axles.
Only sort of agree. While this is a four bun setup, the rear wheels do
not steer. They must use the bun for decorative purposes only. There is
a solid axle going through the bun back to the differential.
But the front shows the assembly very clearly. Only difference is that
the bun side ball is rear facing instead of front facing.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
| (...) I argree with Larry. I have that set (8440) and the way they configured the rear wheel connections, ( I hesitate the use the word "suspension" as, for me, that implys a use of shock asorbing qualities, which, other than the tires themselves, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
| (...) The 8440 has the same suspension setup on both front and rear axles. The instructions are at: (URL) at Kevin Loch's Net Server. Pic 16 shows the front partially assembled and the sub bun on the rear. The 8437 has this setup on the front only. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
