Subject:
|
Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 23:09:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
668 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> G. Benedikt Rochow wrote:
> >
> > Can the new flexible technic axles, as seen in ZNAP sets and some
> > new technic sets, such as 8448, actually be used as axles? From some
> > pictures in the new S@H andretail catalogs, it seems fairly clear to me
> > that there are
> > 1. short round axle-diameter disks towards the ends that won't allow
> > axle-compatible parts to be slid on unless those are really soft, and
> > 2. rod-diameter ends such that there's no usable crossaxle attachment
> > even at the end.
>
> I have 8445 in hand. If you mean the long yellow bent things on each
> side of the cockpit in that set's cover picture, I confirm that both
> numbered assertions above are true.
>
> These are quite rubbery, but even so, forcing them into a cross axle
> hole (I tried a bit with one) will damage them, they're not rubbery
> enough to fit through.
Lovely.
Speaking of 8445, what is between the steering knuckles and the
front wheel hubs?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
| (...) Not sure I totally understand the question, not being a technic head. However the front wheels pivot on two balls that stick out from the frame. The balls are on the end of those 1x2 plate with triangular a-frame parts. The pivoting part seats (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: are flexible technic axles really axles?
|
| (...) I have 8445 in hand. If you mean the long yellow bent things on each side of the cockpit in that set's cover picture, I confirm that both numbered assertions above are true. These are quite rubbery, but even so, forcing them into a cross axle (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![are flexible technic axles really axles? -Gregor Benedikt Rochow (6-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Larry Pieniazek (6-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Larry Pieniazek (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Rob Doucette (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Larry Pieniazek (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -John Morgan (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -John Morgan (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Rob Doucette (8-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Nico Hoogerbrug (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Two kinds of flex axle (was Re: are flexible technic axles really axles? -Eric Brok (7-Jul-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|