 | | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS
|
|
(...) ok. Sorry for the trouble. ...and I finally understand the problem. IE (even the most recent version) is not supporting PNG alpha-channel transparenciy. (but firefox, mozilla...do :-) ) For those who'd enjoy geek stuff, check (URL) you for (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with IE, PNG and BS
|
|
"Didier Enjary" <d.enjary@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:J77wzs.Ar@lugnet.com... (...) Didier - please do NOT set a FUT to off-topic.geek unless someone specifically asks you to - it screws me up when I post something to a newsgroup as I usually (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Trouble with IE, PNG and BS
|
|
Hi, Sorry for this somewhat off-topic subject which I'm not sure where to post - I've FUT to off-topic.geek. I've recently uploaded PNG file format pictures (Photoshop generated) to BS for the first time (I was used with JPGs). The upload has worked (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Timothy D. Freshly wrote: --snip-- (...) Technically I'm encouraging a higher "noise-to-MOC" posting ratio ;) Tim (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
"Tim Gould" <tgould.lego(AT@)gma...(DOT.)com> wrote in message news:J6z7I7.K09@lugnet.com... (...) One reason I do not post very much (whether in response to MOCs or other topics) is that I am generally only able to be on Lugnet maybe once per (...) (18 years ago, 14-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) Except if you share a computer with people you don't trust, of course. ROSCO (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) Now-- ask it to leave you signed in, and you are set to go. I'm always signed in so I never really think about it. JOHN (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) I have never even thought to try posting while signed in. Ha! That's how savvy I am in the ways of online forum posting. (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) I have never even thought to try posting while signed in. Ha! That's how savvy I am in the ways of online forum posting. (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOWORLD 2006 !
|
|
(...) Thanks for the heads up, Ludo! Oh baby, I wonder what wonders will appear this year! {:^d~~0 JOHN (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | LEGOWORLD 2006 !
|
|
Hi all, Next week starts LEGOWORLD 2006 in Zwolle (Holland)! Building up starts on October 18 2006 Open to visitors on October 19 until 24. Keep an eye on Brickshelf for upcoming pictures. Regards, Ludo (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
I'll offer some comments about what I can. (...) Understandable. I've discussed this elsewhere. (...) I just don't understand this. Most of the in-fighting goes on away from the models. (...) I've never noticed this to be a problem and the few times (...) (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
Reason's that I don't post about MOCs at lugnet: 1. Too many MOC's, not enough time. 2. I hang out more at genre specific sites (fbtb, c-s) 3. MocPages lets me see pictures, author notes and make a comment from one page. 4. Other sites have more (...) (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) But the highlight/spotlight isn't visible at all when using a news reader (but maybe I'm alone doing that?). (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) It makes it difficult for anyone. This is precisely why I don't tend to post on some of the more specialized forums. I'll be the first to admit that my photography skills needs help, and that the lighting where I generally take photos isn't (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
--snip-- (...) I still don't think it should be this way. It's not so hard to focus on what is good in an otherwise mediocre model. I've also noticed that MOCs have to also be photographed well these days to get much response... that makes it even (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
Hello! (...) You are probably referring to Mocpages. And what happens there is, I guess, this: People come along a MOC, see it's (for example) Castle stuff, are Mecha kids themselves, think "blah, Castle, boring" and rate it 1/6. On Lugnet there (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) I think you hit it- our standards are so high that a MOC has to REALLY have some element(s) about it to get a response. I don't post much in terms of written feedback but I do use the highlight/spotlight function often. I figure it's giving (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) No need for Atticus .........yet. Though we seem to have enough Boo Radleys about :^) -pete.w (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
|
(...) Then there should be a feature for an uploaded MOC to be rated 1 - 10 or something in a poll. Something really quick and easy-- look at the ESPN poll on the front page. It should work that simple and fast. If I have to log in and go through (...) (18 years ago, 12-Oct-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
