 | | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) Wow, I'm totally amazed. I feel completely the opposite. If a piece isn't available, like the spruce tree in Main Street, that slightly decreases the value of the "Legend" quality. Not so much to deter me from being happy with it or buying the (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) the old (...) imagine (...) I too am blown away that you would have such trouble seeing the difference between these colors. I received a batch of parts from a BL seller and there happened to be one out of 50 that was the new color. That one (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) Together, yes, I can tell. Takes a second, but I can tell. It's not overly hard. Put them together on a MOC? if they're on a flat surface, side by side, then, yes, you can see that something's slightly off. Put them together on the same MOC a (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
WOW, first off Dave, let me say it is nice to see somone able to have rational thoughts about the color issue. It seems as though too many folks are not interested in discussing things just stating "it sucks" or "get over it". Now I will certainly (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) So when will enough have been said? When the thread reaches 300 posts? 400? 1000? When the change is finally reverted [1]? From reading your posts, I don't think it will _e.ver_ be enough for you. Not even if you get your way in the end, (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
|
(...) It was that last sentence that really got me thinking. Some posts I've seen put up about going into a "quasi-dark-age" have just left me uneasy. There is nothing wrong voicing displeasure with what LEGO has done but to take as far as "That's (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) Tim, Agreed. Yes, there are some strong arguments on each side (I have yet to voice my concern for it, let alone for parts) but I think we should talk about set concepts and theme issues and sweet MOCs. Also, "Hello to you" as I haven't spoken (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
|
(...) It doesn't bug me. If they're only going to stick around to complain, then I'd rather not have to filter through their posts. (...) Yes, I think it's quite extreme. It puzzles me, but it doesn't upset me. To each his own. -Tim (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) And the same to you. I was asking Giddens where you had disappeared off to a few weeks ago, and now here you are posting again. Good to hear from you! -Tim (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) See, now, there's the thing...life changes. Not much really stays the same. Adaptation is not just the response, it's the norm. Your lack of willingness to accept change is going to screw you out of a fun hobby. Over a couple of colors. Is (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) It's also an interesting movie, but I think I need to see it a couple more times before I can really work out if i *like* it or not... But anything with Meryl in it is worth at least a couple of viewings ;) ROSCO (FUT o-t.fun) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
