Subject:
|
Digital Photography
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Jun 1999 16:28:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
521 times
|
| |
|
|
I've been thinking about how to get my Lego website going, and with how
long it takes me to get film developed, and then scanned, I think I need
to go directly digital. I do have options though, I have a WinTV
TV/Video Capture card.
What I'm wondering is if anyone has any experiences to compare with
using a video camera vs a digital camera? I am thinking of spending
about $500. Macro capability is very important for me.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Digital Photography
|
| (...) Not that you'd go this route, but there are several places in my town that'll transfer my pix to diskette while they're making prints. That's how I've been doing it. I've seen some video cameras that get really close, like one or two inches. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Digital Photography
|
| (...) You've got a few options: 1. Get your film processed onto disk, CD-ROM, or the Kodak Net. I'm sure Kodak's web site has more info, or go down to your local Kodak film developing drop off (not the instore developer) and inquire. Pros: cheap. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
