To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 45007
45006  |  45008
Subject: 
Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:48:25 GMT
Viewed: 
2787 times
  
> > You must have read my mind.  It was, in fact, a 1x1 with a stud on one side that
> > I was really thinking of.  I will love to have and will use the piece Huw noted
> > above, but it would also be nice to have one that didn't need any clearance on
> > the side opposite the face of the brick.
> 
> Eh, just back it up to a 1x1 or 1x2 technic brick with the
> peghole in the right place, and it's all good.  But I agree
> that it would have been nicer to see a the megablok part
> rendered in "the good stuff" instead.

Or use a 1 x 1 Technic Brick with a half pin in the first place...

:)

--
Best regards,
/Tobbe
<http://www.lotek.nu>
(remove SPAM when e-mailing)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New element (Was: Re: New x-pod sets)
 
(...) Eh, just back it up to a 1x1 or 1x2 technic brick with the peghole in the right place, and it's all good. But I agree that it would have been nicer to see a the megablok part rendered in "the good stuff" instead. (...) I do agree--still have (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR