 | | Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | Hi Mike - Great comments! (...) Yep. I think it's not too cool when people are afraid to post constructive criticism. I think though, people only get upset at posters when they say something blatantly negative about a model - which discourages (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community) —Michael Arrighi
|
| | | | | (...) Hi Tim, I've been reading this post with fascination and hope I'm not replying too late. First, thanks for bringing up such an interesting topic! For me, LUGNET is a great way to catch up on Lego-related news, and I consider myself a member of (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community) —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | | | (...) Ummm...no, that would be me. (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi Michael - (...) Not at all! In fact, I think as this thread continues, we're getting better and better responses, getting down to the meat of things. (...) There are many LEGO fans which fit that description. More than half of my train club (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | | (...) Okay, I've read this several times, and I still don't get it. How is the setup for LUGNET posting confusing? Links from the main page ((URL) and from a page that appears each time you post through the Web interface take you to (URL) page is (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Keep in mind, people who just discover LUGNET, or who do not participate in the newsgroup discussion are going to visit (URL) You scan the front page and what do you see? A link to LUGNET membership. MANY I have talked to have confused (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | posting setup — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That's a really good point. We should make this a lot easier to find. (...) This would be ideal. All the sign-up and set-up stuff is sorely overdue for a rework. I'll be giving this some serious attention in May when I get back from San (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: posting setup —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Yep, I've noticed (in fact, I think I was a catalyst, from some recent mails) ;-) Thanks for this! (...) I would much appreciate a feature to easily be able to post from multiple addresses! When I fanned out, and added a brickmedia.com and an (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: posting setup — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Portland actually. Steve says: "Yours are too small." --Todd (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: posting setup —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) No love for the 1.5-wides? Aww. Engineer Max (oh the resemblance: (URL) "watch 6-wide Thomass get rammed by bulky 8-wide cars." (URL) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: posting setup —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Doh! Typo...funny one at that. -Tim (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: posting setup —David Laswell
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree, and with good reason. Until just now I was under the impression that a paid membership WAS required. After seeing the link to the membership sign-up page, it never even occured to me that it wasn't required for posting. I've even had (...) (22 years ago, 27-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) I agree. Let's all keep this in mind over the next few weeks as the setup/sign-up stuff on LUGNET is overhauled and keep our collective eyes out for points of confusion. (...) I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The core purpose of LUGNET (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) [...] (...) Cool. (...) A good goal for LUGNET to have. What I'm trying to get to is this; I believe, based on what I've heard coming out of discussions with many different types of LEGO fans, there are (sometimes quite valid) perceptions (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy —David Schwanke
|
| | | | | | "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:HDJoDL.156p@lugnet.com... (...) documentation (...) joining (...) I wasnt sure where to put this but since it came up here I thought this might work. I am an NNTP posting fan so when I found (...) (22 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | (Speaking of sugar coating... After reading through this post again I can see that there's bits in here to offend probably every single person who reads it. What can I say? I can only advise the casual reader that if you find yourself strongly (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | | | Quoting Mike Rayhawk <rayhawk@artcenter.edu>: [snipped everywhere] (...) Why didn't this ever occur to me?! I might have to print some up and keep them in my wallet! Man! Year's wasted! Now if only I could come up with some sort of easy format "joke (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) See movie-comics.com, in the archives.. one of the characters, IIRC, was a guy who just holds up signs with emoticons and internet abbreviations like LOL. Pretty funny (one of my fave bits of the comic actually) HTH! (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) It gets worse: Lego, computer message boards, gaming. The last is damning! No emoticons to soften that. Happy? (which comes off as snippy for those who don't realize I'm a long-time gamer, which illustrates the problems with the written word) (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | Snip a LOT... Wow, I just posted, but Bruce, you put it far better than I could have, I think! :-) -Tim (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | | | | (...) lol I was hoping someone would pick up on that! It's like the triple crown of geekdom. (...) Well no, you're one of the people I view as ignoring the criticism and going straight to jumping on Tom. Nothing wrong with that, since you seem to (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I just got a huge 5' by 9' green indoor/outdoor carpet for a Fantasy Rules! miniatures battle with Lego. Geek, geek, geek. Still, I could ratchet it up one more notch by using a game actually designed for Lego (which I keep meaning to do). (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Hey, don't discriminate on age! :) Though, some younger teenagers tend to go through mood swings in which they alternatively moan about how bad the world is and then suddenly respond to evey MOC posted in the past month or so. Also, some less (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious geekdom —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) You have no idea just how high the scale goes, you should see some of the things people have showed me over the years. I was pretty impressed by the Palm OS BrikWars calculator, and then there was a guy who made a Java app that let you play (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Dare I point out that some people <gasp> post MOCs of Dr. Who and Star Wars models.... eeyaaah! I feel the sudden need to run out, grab a cheap light beer, and watch a football game while grunting at other "non-geeky" men. Maybe that will cure (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I tried that strange liquid you refer to as 'cheap light beer' once. Blech. Gimme an import - does that make me more geeky? -Tim (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Oh, come now. Read all my posts on Lugnet. Not just the ones in .debate or just this thread, ALL of them. Then come back and tell me I like to see how much trouble I can stir up. -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Obnoxious over-reaction vs. sugar coating —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) I've flamed very few people on Lugnet. Maybe you just have a sore spot because you were one of them? (...) Well, we agree on something else. I find you too obnoxious for words too. Of all the people on Lugnet I ignore, Scott is the #1 on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | Hi Mike - (...) Well, I'm not offended by any of it :-) I think it's all good stuff moving the discussion forward. (...) LOL! (...) I'm not offended in the least. I've long known that, ever since starting to LEGOfest even way back to 1999. I think (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating —Thomas Stangl
|
| | | | (...) Yay, great, a Believer!... (...) Hrm, uh, er, maybe not... (...) Yay, he Believes again!... (...) Nevermind, he's degenerated into calling me insane... NOTE: ;-) END NOTE. I'm politically incorrect, but progressive (I consider Political (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
