Subject:
|
Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:29:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1223 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> > > I wonder how much bandwidth would be freed up if BrickShelf
> > > prevented off-site linking?
> >
> > Well, I for one would abandon BS if this happened, unless links from LUGNET
> > pages were allowed (and I'd probably remove my LUGNET pages too, as they'd
> > be even more boring without the BS pics).
> >
> > ROSCO
>
> If BrickShelf started making you pay for the service of off-site deep
> linking, would you abandon it as well?
I'd have to compare the fee and services provided against other hosts. In
general I have no problem paying for a good service. Currently, aside from
the bandwidth problem, Brickshelf provides all the services I need, for the
best price.
> There are (much faster, more reliable) image hosting services out there,
> they just cost money.
Exactly.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
