To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 38191
38190  |  38192
Subject: 
Re: A good LEGO anecdote, and a bad one (A warning about buying Monster Studios sets)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:46:01 GMT
Viewed: 
655 times
  
In lugnet.general, A. Mark Wilburn writes:
A person lacking in morals could theoretically open said box in this manner,
take out what they wanted, and then glue the box closed again.  The store
would never notice when they took it back as a return as it would appear to
be a completely sealed new set.

Hmm. Good point Troy; I guess it simply hadn't crossed my mind that someone
would do that, but you're right; re-gluing it would be possible. And you're
right: it did seem a little coincidental that all the 'must-have' pieces
were what was taken out (and would also explain the open polybags in a
sealed box). Perhaps that's what happened to Paul Hanson and his near miss
with the soccer bus?! In which case, this brings up an entirely new issue:
what can be done to fix this? It's not even shoplifting that can be caught
on camera anymore! If stores change the refund policies, honest people who
get actual factory mistakes would be stuck. Could Lego possibly make the
package more tamper proof?? They could make the boxes more fragile so that
any tampering would be visible... but then people who actually collect the
boxes would be disappointed that they aren't sturdy enough. Plastic windows
in all sets so we can see if the contents are intact? Cost prohibitive (I
think).

hmm... what about a seal around all the seams of the box? That doesn't help
the retailer much in the case of fraudulent returns, but it would at least
help consumers avoid the sets that have already been tampered with?

Well, I've never had a missing piece problem, but I have seen boxes that
appeared to be tampered with in the stores.  However, this was much more
noticeable.  In certain stores I saw Bionicle Krana and Mask packs that had
been shrink wrapped; maybe to stop the seemingly worldwide habit of certain
people to open the box, check the masks, and then take them.

What LEGO could do I couldn't help on.  I do know that I don't like the
packaging on sets like 7317 Aero Tube Hangar or 7191 UCS X-Wing, because of
the tendency to break after excessive handling.  I think to prevent this the
retailers have to take more drastic steps, rather than an entire package
redesign.  Certain sets last year were perforated with 2 semi-circles, and
after being opened, I noticed the boxes seemed to be made of a denser
cardboard-ish material.

-Kevin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A good LEGO anecdote, and a bad one (A warning about buying Monster Studios sets)
 
... (...) This is *exactly* the type of box we're discussing. When I purchased my Vampire's Crypt, I was sure it was unopened as it didn't look tampered with (no crushed or torn edges), and the 2 perforated semicirlces were intact. Then Troy pointed (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A good LEGO anecdote, and a bad one (A warning about buying Monster Studios sets)
 
(...) Hmm. Good point Troy; I guess it simply hadn't crossed my mind that someone would do that, but you're right; re-gluing it would be possible. And you're right: it did seem a little coincidental that all the 'must-have' pieces were what was (...) (22 years ago, 28-Aug-02, to lugnet.general)

20 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR